In what distance would a Bugatti Veyron beat that Vauxhall..

On Jul 19, 4:19 pm, "Burgerman" wrote:


> You can pick bits of sentences out of huge posts all you like,


It's more than simply "picking apart sentences". You make all this
puffery and noise about comprehension of what a car can do blah blah
blah etc. , and then demonstrate that you have no earthly idea. And
then waste bandwidth trying to backtrack.

Btw, yes, I'm fully aware of how fast a top-fueler is and they too
make the big part of their speed/time in the very early stages and
experience diminishing returns as they go down the track.


> it does not
> alter the fact that the veyron is outgunned


Unless of course they happen to be going around corners.


Btw, you've never actually seen these two cars race at over 200.
AFAIK, only one of them has actually proven it's stable and roadworthy
at those speeds. Of course we're talking about a tin can some guy
shoved a big engine into in his garage -vs- $1.5 million worth of
engineering.

"Doc" wrote in message

> On Jul 16, 8:06 am, "Burgerman" wrote:
>
>> I see you cut all the stuff you didnt like again...
>> I have forgotten more about really fast cars and bikes than
>
>
> <snip self-aggrandizing>
>
>
> I said I was done with this but thought I'd share with the world what
> I just found while clearing out my spamcatcher e-mail address.
>
> Spaketh Burgerman in e-mail:
>
> ">> Its accellerating harder at 150 than the veyron can off the line!
>>
>>
>> The Veyron does 0 - 60 in 2.46 on street tires. Are you asserting
> that
>> Vauxhall is going to do 150 - 212 in 2.5 secs?
>
>
> Approximately yes."
>
>
> How 'bout that. Yet another instance of you saying what you're
> swearing up and down you never said.
>


Look. You claimed that the comparison was laughable.
Now it seems that you were a bit wrong.

You can pick bits of sentences out of huge posts all you like, it does not
alter the fact that the veyron is outgunned at all speeds by the "laughable"
vauxhall. Right up to and including its top speed.