Welcome to AutoBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Accord bites the dust

 
Goto page 1, 2
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Honda -> Honda Accord Forum -> 2006 Honda Accord Forum RSS
Next:  Colorado Bed Second Layer  
Author Message
Elliot Richmond

External


Since: Jul 26, 2004
Posts: 72



(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:10 pm
Post subject: Accord bites the dust
Archived from groups: alt>autos>honda (more info?)

Well, my 14 year old Honda Accord with 195,000 miles suffered a
catastrophic mechanical failure, due to the right front wheel
colliding with a concrete highway barrier. This caused upper and lower
control arm damage, axle damage, and other damaged bits. The estimate
for repair was 3300 USD. As the car is only worth 1900 USD, it's
toast. Yes, I could fix it my self, but I am too old and stiff to much
enjoy that anymore.

Consequently. we are in the market for a newish 2004 - 2006 Accord
with roughly equivalent trim (EX). I am leaning toward the 4 cylinder
V-Tech engine as the 4 cylinder was more than adequate for the Accord
we had and the new ones are not that much bigger.

At the risk of boring everyone, I may share some of our shopping
experiences with the group. One immediate difference I noticed from 13
years ago is that there is a wealth of information available on the
Internet. How much of that information is reliable is yet to be
determined.


Elliot Richmond
Itinerant astronomy teacher

 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This message is not archived

 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elliot Richmond

External


Since: Jul 26, 2004
Posts: 72



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 1:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 13:15:21 -0400, "Elmo P. Shagnasty"
<elmop.TakeThisOut@nastydesigns.com> wrote:

>In article <7dkn83h1ajoj5755mu484bi44g8f0u6fpq.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>,
> Elliot Richmond <xmrichmond.TakeThisOut@xaustin.xrr.xcom> wrote:
>
>> Consequently. we are in the market for a newish 2004 - 2006 Accord
>> with roughly equivalent trim (EX). I am leaning toward the 4 cylinder
>> V-Tech engine as the 4 cylinder was more than adequate for the Accord
>> we had and the new ones are not that much bigger.
>
>Get an 02 EX. That's the last year of that generation, and that was a
>fantastic car.

Thanks. I will investigate that possibility.


Elliot Richmond
Itinerant astronomy teacher
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
user25

External


Since: Apr 21, 2004
Posts: 26



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Elliot Richmond wrote:
> Well, my 14 year old Honda Accord with 195,000 miles suffered a
> catastrophic mechanical failure, due to the right front wheel
> colliding with a concrete highway barrier. This caused upper and lower
> control arm damage, axle damage, and other damaged bits. The estimate
> for repair was 3300 USD. As the car is only worth 1900 USD, it's
> toast. Yes, I could fix it my self, but I am too old and stiff to much
> enjoy that anymore.
>
> Consequently. we are in the market for a newish 2004 - 2006 Accord
> with roughly equivalent trim (EX). I am leaning toward the 4 cylinder
> V-Tech engine as the 4 cylinder was more than adequate for the Accord
> we had and the new ones are not that much bigger.
>
> At the risk of boring everyone, I may share some of our shopping
> experiences with the group. One immediate difference I noticed from 13
> years ago is that there is a wealth of information available on the
> Internet. How much of that information is reliable is yet to be
> determined.
>
>
> Elliot Richmond
> Itinerant astronomy teacher

I have an '02 4cyl and, while a great trouble free car, it's a dog in terms
of power...

a
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
jim beam

External


Since: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: 1210



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

a wrote:
> Elliot Richmond wrote:
>> Well, my 14 year old Honda Accord with 195,000 miles suffered a
>> catastrophic mechanical failure, due to the right front wheel
>> colliding with a concrete highway barrier. This caused upper and lower
>> control arm damage, axle damage, and other damaged bits. The estimate
>> for repair was 3300 USD. As the car is only worth 1900 USD, it's
>> toast. Yes, I could fix it my self, but I am too old and stiff to much
>> enjoy that anymore.
>>
>> Consequently. we are in the market for a newish 2004 - 2006 Accord
>> with roughly equivalent trim (EX). I am leaning toward the 4 cylinder
>> V-Tech engine as the 4 cylinder was more than adequate for the Accord
>> we had and the new ones are not that much bigger.
>>
>> At the risk of boring everyone, I may share some of our shopping
>> experiences with the group. One immediate difference I noticed from 13
>> years ago is that there is a wealth of information available on the
>> Internet. How much of that information is reliable is yet to be
>> determined.
>>
>>
>> Elliot Richmond
>> Itinerant astronomy teacher
>
> I have an '02 4cyl and, while a great trouble free car, it's a dog in
> terms of power...
>
rubbish. either there's something wrong with it or you don't know how
to drive. either way, fix the problem.
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
user25

External


Since: Apr 21, 2004
Posts: 26



(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 9:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article <K2Xii.21782$tB5.20753@edtnps90>, a <a.DeleteThis@a.ca> wrote:
>
>>> It happened. Get over it.
>>>
>>> Why does it bother you that this happened?
>>>
>> Not bothered at all - I just think you're bending the truth.
>
> I'm not.
>
> Why would you think I'm bending the truth? Do you have different
> experiences with a similar car?
>

Yes.

a
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Grumpy AuContraire

External


Since: Dec 25, 2006
Posts: 489



(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2007 11:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:

> In article <K2Xii.21782$tB5.20753@edtnps90>, a <a DeleteThis @a.ca> wrote:
>
>
>>>It happened. Get over it.
>>>
>>>Why does it bother you that this happened?
>>>
>>
>>Not bothered at all - I just think you're bending the truth.
>
>
> I'm not.
>
> Why would you think I'm bending the truth? Do you have different
> experiences with a similar car?
>


You're wastin' your breath... He don't have no freakin' clue!

JT
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 11) Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:41 am
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 12) Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:14 am
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
Jim Yanik1

External


Since: Sep 02, 2003
Posts: 740



(Msg. 13) Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:55 am
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Elmo P. Shagnasty" <elmop DeleteThis @nastydesigns.com> wrote in
news:elmop-5B45AB.10140305072007@nntp1.usenetserver.com:

> In article <Xns99646434D8735jyanikkuanet DeleteThis @64.209.0.85>,
> Jim Yanik <jyanik DeleteThis @abuse.gov> wrote:
>
>> > Since you're the fool who is disputing our claims, the onus is on
>> > you to prove us wrong.
>> >
>>
>> Sorry,it doesn't work that way;the one who made the claim of 35 MPG
>> is the one who needs to show proof.
>
> No, I simply need to offer it as a datum point.

It's not "data",it's a CLAIM to be data.
>
> Evaluate the other data points, and see what you get.
>
> Let's see....you're the only one who's disputing it, so...
>
>

Again,you're asking him to prove a negative.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Elmo P. Shagnasty

External


Since: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: 1073



(Msg. 14) Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 11:55 am
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
JXStern

External


Since: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 196



(Msg. 15) Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:55 pm
Post subject: Re: Accord bites the dust [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:10:52 -0500, Elliot Richmond
<xmrichmond.DeleteThis@xaustin.xrr.xcom> wrote:

>Consequently. we are in the market for a newish 2004 - 2006 Accord
>with roughly equivalent trim (EX). I am leaning toward the 4 cylinder
>V-Tech engine as the 4 cylinder was more than adequate for the Accord
>we had and the new ones are not that much bigger.

Had the 2004 EX4, outstanding car. I think you will really notice the
changes made from generation to generation, most are improvements! Smile

My 2007 is still not getting the same mileage ...

I never drove your 1993 vintage (my 87 lasted too long!), but presume
the new engines deliver more power and more smoothly. Again, try it
and see, if you have not already done so.

J.
 >> Stay informed about: Accord bites the dust 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Difference between the 06 accord and the 05 accord? - I've seen some bits and pieces of differences. Does anyone have a good URL or list? Thanks

leasing an 06 accord - I had to order an 06 accord because they didn't ahve what I wanted ANYWHERE (2.4 5 speed with nav EX-L) I got the price down to what I think is fair (24,800 with the rear wing spoiler installed) so the last hurdle will be leasing, I've heard from a lo...

The 2006 Honda Accord - Already the most refined and luxurious Accord ever, the bar has been raised even further for 2006. Accord Sedan and Coupe styling takes on a dynamic new and sporting character for 2006. Revved up exterior elements on all Accord's include new front and....

Strut bar for 06 accord? - does anyone know if anyone makes a front strut tower brace (aka, Strut bar, aka FSTB) for the 06 accord yet? I have a 06 sedan I4.

any news for 2006 Accord? - Went to a local Honda dealer checked the 2005 Accord with navigation. It is cool and helpful option. Wondering if it will be available for 2006 model to have the blue tooth? Should I wait?
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Honda -> Honda Accord Forum -> 2006 Honda Accord Forum All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]