Wow! How about that new Genesis!

Mike Marlow wrote:
> "Thee Chicago Wolf" <.@.> wrote in message

>> Why should someone's "work" truck consume at twice the rate my car
>> does and not pay any penalty just because of a loophole in a law?
>
> And why should they pay a penalty beyond the price they already pay for the
> vehicle and fuel? You're starting to sound like you're all about penalizing
> anyone who does not fit into your definition of what is acceptable.

That is exactly what he is about.
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

"St Peters" <Pastor.RemoveThis@StPetersWaterford.com> wrote in message
news:47a8a929$0$1113$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> Yes, it is cool. But it's not big enough or expensive enough for me. I'm
> waiting for Hyundai to move into production their concept car, the Hyundai
> "Tanker". It has tracks instead of tires and sports an optional 50mm
> cannon. That'll piss off the eco-loony Democrats and also make the
> Republicans in the SUV's think twice before they tailgate.
>
> Fred

Now that is the most "Fair and balanced" statement I've read in this thread!
Are you employed by FOX news?
LOL. ;c)

Jack Cassidy
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Thee Chicago Wolf wrote:
>> That doesn't matter. The point is that you are complaining about people
>> who drive trucks that get worse mileage than your Sonata. I'm simply
>> point out how hypocritical you are since you are driving a vehicle that
>> gets much poorer mileage than alternatives such as the Prius.
>>
>> Kind of like Al Gore in his energy guzzling mansion flying around in
>> jets and complaining about global warming.
>
> Matt, again, you're twisting the argument to suit your logical
> fallacy. I think we already figured you read Republican 101 material
> with these arguments (or Ann Coulter???) because it's easier for you
> to go on tangents rather than stick to the original point of the
> argument. Does the term non sequitur mean anything to you because it's
> what you just did. As usual, you've nothing that constitutes a
> position and choose cheap zings and pot shots as a statement of fact.
>
> So now I'm a hypocrite because I don't OWN a Prius? I don't WANT to
> own a Prius because, for my purposes, family size, and overall use,
> it's too small. The point, originally, is that SUV's and large trucks
> are not subject to what's in the Energy Tax Act of 78. That's all I
> ever stated, you added all this garbage, not me. I said to level the
> playing field, not complain about trucks. I can complain with the best
> of them but it's just opinion. Buy whatever friggin vehicle you want
> but bring the law up to date with today's vehicles. Are you clear on
> this point now? It's not possible to make it any more lucid. I'm not
> speaking in Chinese.

What does this have to do with the ETA 78?

"Why should the rest of America pay for your overconsumption of gas? So
what if you have the money, you anti-americanism stinks."

Or this?

"No one needs a crew-cab V8 with 8ft bed or
dualie to get groceries or drive to the office. Same for Hummers, same
for Navigators, same for blah blah blah. But, people can do whatever
they want with their money. If you can afford it, good for you. Don't
screw the rest of the American populous in the interim with you
obsession with waste and consumerism. Exxon is happy that you've
helped them break a global record for profit on gas this past year.
Yay for you. May the Arab Oil Czars put their blessing on you and your
family. Allah Ahkbar."

You simply think that your vehicle is the gold standard for what fuel
mileage should be and anyone who drives a vehicle that gets less mileage
than your current vehicle is wasteful.

I'm simply pointing out your elitism and hypocrisy. I'm sorry it
stings, but sometimes that is the way the truth is.

Matt
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Thee Chicago Wolf wrote:
>> That doesn't matter. The point is that you are complaining about people
>> who drive trucks that get worse mileage than your Sonata. I'm simply
>> point out how hypocritical you are since you are driving a vehicle that
>> gets much poorer mileage than alternatives such as the Prius.
>>
>> Kind of like Al Gore in his energy guzzling mansion flying around in
>> jets and complaining about global warming.
>
> Matt, again, you're twisting the argument to suit your logical
> fallacy. I think we already figured you read Republican 101 material
> with these arguments (or Ann Coulter???) because it's easier for you
> to go on tangents rather than stick to the original point of the
> argument. Does the term non sequitur mean anything to you because it's
> what you just did. As usual, you've nothing that constitutes a
> position and choose cheap zings and pot shots as a statement of fact.
>
> So now I'm a hypocrite because I don't OWN a Prius? I don't WANT to
> own a Prius because, for my purposes, family size, and overall use,
> it's too small. The point, originally, is that SUV's and large trucks
> are not subject to what's in the Energy Tax Act of 78. That's all I
> ever stated, you added all this garbage, not me. I said to level the
> playing field, not complain about trucks. I can complain with the best
> of them but it's just opinion. Buy whatever friggin vehicle you want
> but bring the law up to date with today's vehicles. Are you clear on
> this point now? It's not possible to make it any more lucid. I'm not
> speaking in Chinese.
>
> - Thee Chicago Wolf

Posting it twice doesn't add any credibility.
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Thee Chicago Wolf wrote:
>> Thee Chicago Wolf wrote:
>>>> NO... This may sound alien to ya but I work for myself(construction) and
>>>> have written paychecks to employees...Hell, I not only shop at Walmart , my
>>>> wife works there. I drive a 95 Silverado for work,wife drives an 06
>>>> Elantra.If you could see my size you would understand why I refer to
>>>> subcompacts as go-carts...LOL... I work DAMN hard to earn my money and will
>>>> spend it as I see fit.Screw you nanny types and global warming snake oil
>>>> salesmen........
>>> You don't even see the irony in it all. I never mentioned global
>>> warming. I am talking about rate of consumption. Big difference.
>>> Please continue to support the Chinese and Arab economies, they're
>>> depending on you.
>> And you with that gas guzzling Sonata that doesn't even get 30 MPG.
>
> Zing. Thanks for the input Matt.

Thanks for the entertainment.
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Thee Chicago Wolf wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:31:51 GMT, Matt Whiting <whiting.TakeThisOut@epix.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>> "Thee Chicago Wolf" <.@.> wrote in message
>>>> Why should someone's "work" truck consume at twice the rate my car
>>>> does and not pay any penalty just because of a loophole in a law?
>>> And why should they pay a penalty beyond the price they already pay for the
>>> vehicle and fuel? You're starting to sound like you're all about penalizing
>>> anyone who does not fit into your definition of what is acceptable.
>> That is exactly what he is about.
>
> Matt, we all know you have no valid opinion. You just zing from the
> outskirts and have no position. Troll.

Ha, ha, ha... More entertainment, but not as good as before. Try to up
your game a little.
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Thee Chicago Wolf wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 23:31:51 GMT, Matt Whiting <whiting.DeleteThis@epix.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Mike Marlow wrote:
>>> "Thee Chicago Wolf" <.@.> wrote in message
>>>> Why should someone's "work" truck consume at twice the rate my car
>>>> does and not pay any penalty just because of a loophole in a law?
>>> And why should they pay a penalty beyond the price they already pay for the
>>> vehicle and fuel? You're starting to sound like you're all about penalizing
>>> anyone who does not fit into your definition of what is acceptable.
>> That is exactly what he is about.
>
> Matt, we all know you have no valid opinion. You just zing from the
> outskirts and have no position. Troll.

Funny, it seems that the opinions of the group are running unanimously
against you. So who has the more valid opinion?
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

"benick" <benick.DeleteThis@fairpoint.net> wrote in message
> I suppose next you will be whining that my house is to big as well and we
> need laws to regulate square footage per person....Socialist moonbat.....
>

You may have made that comment in jest, but exactly that was suggested by a
writer to the Editor of the Hartford Courant. Inspired by a couple of
recent articles about farmland being developed and lack of starter houses, a
writer suggested that couple with no children be made to move from their
large homes so others with greater need for space for families can take them
over. Older couples should move to a condo or small apartment.
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

I saw it at the Detroit Auto Show and was impressed by the interior but
prefer the Azera's exterior. If it came down to the two I think I would
chose the Azera as it would be more than adequate for my needs and
probably 5k cheaper, although who knows what the price of the 6 cyl.
will be (perhaps equal to the Azera but that wouldn't make much
marketing sense to me. On the other hand I would also test drive the
Genesis and then who knows????
John

Hank wrote:
> WOW !!!!! has anybody seen the NEW HYUNDAI GENESIS YET ?
>
>
> Hank
>
>
> "Rob" <bucfan11.RemoveThis@SPAMtampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:13qi03q60tjqne0@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "jp103" <jpoinier110522mi.RemoveThis@nospamcomcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:htOdnZj-08vuLTXanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Is that a forward, rear or swivel mounted canon? I personally prefer
>>> the forward mounted to clear the left-lane laggards! With a good
>>> strong rear bumper tailgaters won't bother me.
>>>
>>> John
>>> St Peters wrote:
>>>> Yes, it is cool. But it's not big enough or expensive enough for
>>>> me. I'm waiting for Hyundai to move into production their concept
>>>> car, the Hyundai "Tanker". It has tracks instead of tires and
>>>> sports an optional 50mm cannon. That'll piss off the eco-loony
>>>> Democrats and also make the Republicans in the SUV's think twice
>>>> before they tailgate.
>>>>
>>>> Fred
>>
>> With all the diesel smoke, no one will tailgate.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> <bought2bought.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:b50d16a4-c6ea-4230-bd16-2031c69c1510@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Just saw a commercial during the Super Bowl for the Hyundai Genesis!
>>>>> Too bad i can't afford to buy one, so i have to settle for the Sonata,
>>>>> but that Genesis is a beauty!! Hyundai has come a long long long
>>>>> way!!!
>>>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Well jp thanks for the answer but my question was just a little sarcastic
question seeing as how the thread was getting a little off course of the
original question. I'm personally waiting for Hyundai to come out with a
super car the size of a 59' Caddy that only gets 3 1/2 miles to the gallon.
I of course cant afford the car let alone the gas for it but hell I dont
want to be the only person in the world thats not in debt up to my eyeballs.
I figured it out and my 34 room house will be paid for by the time my great
great great great grandson is about 137 years old but HELL I cant take it
with me and so far neither can he.

Hank


"jp103" <jpoinier110522mi.TakeThisOut@nospamcomcast.net> wrote in message
news:0dmdnSz1OMA5MDTanZ2dnUVZ_rWtnZ2d@comcast.com...
>I saw it at the Detroit Auto Show and was impressed by the interior but
>prefer the Azera's exterior. If it came down to the two I think I would
>chose the Azera as it would be more than adequate for my needs and probably
>5k cheaper, although who knows what the price of the 6 cyl. will be
>(perhaps equal to the Azera but that wouldn't make much marketing sense to
>me. On the other hand I would also test drive the Genesis and then who
>knows????
> John
>
> Hank wrote:
>> WOW !!!!! has anybody seen the NEW HYUNDAI GENESIS YET ?
>>
>>
>> Hank
>>
>>
>> "Rob" <bucfan11.TakeThisOut@SPAMtampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:13qi03q60tjqne0@corp.supernews.com...
>>>
>>> "jp103" <jpoinier110522mi.TakeThisOut@nospamcomcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:htOdnZj-08vuLTXanZ2dnUVZ_srinZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>> Is that a forward, rear or swivel mounted canon? I personally prefer
>>>> the forward mounted to clear the left-lane laggards! With a good
>>>> strong rear bumper tailgaters won't bother me.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>> St Peters wrote:
>>>>> Yes, it is cool. But it's not big enough or expensive enough for me.
>>>>> I'm waiting for Hyundai to move into production their concept car, the
>>>>> Hyundai "Tanker". It has tracks instead of tires and sports an
>>>>> optional 50mm cannon. That'll piss off the eco-loony Democrats and
>>>>> also make the Republicans in the SUV's think twice before they
>>>>> tailgate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fred
>>>
>>> With all the diesel smoke, no one will tailgate.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <bought2bought.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:b50d16a4-c6ea-4230-bd16-2031c69c1510@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> Just saw a commercial during the Super Bowl for the Hyundai Genesis!
>>>>>> Too bad i can't afford to buy one, so i have to settle for the
>>>>>> Sonata,
>>>>>> but that Genesis is a beauty!! Hyundai has come a long long long
>>>>>> way!!!
>>>>>
>>
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

"Edwin Pawlowski" <esp.DeleteThis@snet.net> wrote in message
news:zm9qj.7657$Ch6.3139@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "benick" <benick.DeleteThis@fairpoint.net> wrote in message
>> I suppose next you will be whining that my house is to big as well and we
>> need laws to regulate square footage per person....Socialist moonbat.....
>>
>
> You may have made that comment in jest, but exactly that was suggested by
> a writer to the Editor of the Hartford Courant. Inspired by a couple of
> recent articles about farmland being developed and lack of starter houses,
> a writer suggested that couple with no children be made to move from their
> large homes so others with greater need for space for families can take
> them over. Older couples should move to a condo or small apartment.
>
No it was not in jest as it has been mentioned on other message boards I
visit by the Moonbat Crowd....Another"catch phrase" the moonbats use
is"Rural Cleansing". I like to call them watermellons...Green on the
outside,RED on the inside...
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis! 

Yeah, but you will be happy with the Sonata. Its V6 version is one of the
smoothest powerplants I have ever heard in a car. Plenty of power and
beautiful to drive.

This is a car company that really needs to be watched. They seem to be
doing a lot of things right.


<bought2bought.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b50d16a4-c6ea-4230-bd16-2031c69c1510@q39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> Just saw a commercial during the Super Bowl for the Hyundai Genesis!
> Too bad i can't afford to buy one, so i have to settle for the Sonata,
> but that Genesis is a beauty!! Hyundai has come a long long long
> way!!!
 >> Stay informed about: Wow! How about that new Genesis!