"SnoMan" <admin RemoveThis @snoman.com> wrote in message
news:7r5i32tmt2gg4mq5ml662f0m7is90rapts@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 00:17:05 GMT, "BOB" <twomay RemoveThis @sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>I am getting conflicting stories about the timing belt on my 1996 T100 ,
>>SR5
>>with V6 Auto.
>>
>>1) If the belt snaps it will result in major damage to the engine but the
>>manual that I have
>> states "Toyota trucks do not have interference engines; where damage
>>will occur if the belt
>> snaps?
>>
>>2) I have also been told that this engine has some sort of plate/or? that
>>can be removed to allow
>> inspection of the belt without replacement?
>>
>> Can anyone clarify these issues for me? Thanks
>>
>
>
> If it has never been changed, it is overdue. Interferance of not, you
> do not want to wait for it to snap and leave you stranded and then
> have to retime everything. It is easier to cahnge while it is still
> intact.
I'm not sure that is true. Yes, it's incrementally easier, I suppose. But
getting the motor back to TDC and the cams set to the right spot is easy.
All of this stuff has marks on it, and one merely aligns the marks after
making sure the crank is in the right spot.
I agree that walking home is a pain, but the motor will not self-destruct if
the timing belt breaks -- which was the original question.
Also, automatics are harder on timing belts because of sudden
> RPM changes when shifting. It is not unsually for a worn out one to
> snap durring a firm gear change.
> -----------------
> The SnoMan
> www.thesnoman.com >> Stay informed about: Timing belt on T100 V6?