Welcome to AutoBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ    SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Toyota RSS
Next:  Crossed the 250K mile mark today  
Author Message
Ray O

External


Since: Jun 02, 2006
Posts: 4627



(Msg. 31) Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 3:39 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>autos>toyota (more info?)

"Jeff Strickland" wrote in message

>
><snipped>

>>> I get HOW the sensor work, and what they are telling us. What I am
>>> saying is that the after CAT sensor is saying the CAT is not working
>>> right, but I maintain the CAT is fine and the after-CAT sensor itself is
>>> failing.
>>
>> The facts don't match what you maintain, therefore you ignore the facts?
>>
>>>
>>> The exhaust stream going into the CAT is okay, but the stream coming out
>>> is being reported as out of spec. If the stream is REPORTED as out of
>>> spec, then the problem can be eitherb the CAT itself, or the sensor
>>> making the report. The stream going into the CAT is within spec,
>>> therefore there is no point in checking system components that adjust
>>> the upstream exhaust contents.
>>>
>>
>> How do you KNOW that the exhaust going into the cat is within spec?
>>
>
> Because there is a sensor that says so. More accurately, there is a sensor
> that does not say the exhaust stream is out of spec.
>

Which sensor checks whether the exhaust stream going into the cat is in or
out of spec? What is it checking for?


>> You may think that there is no point in checking system components that
>> adjust the upstream exhaust components, however, the folks that designed
>> and built the system think differently and so list several components and
>> systems to check. I would trust their advice before I trusted your
>> advice or my advice. I am simply relaying what the factory says to
>> check.
>>
>
> I would trust them too, but in the face of not having all of the
> diagnostic tools at my disposal, I have to replace stuff at home using a
> Best Guess method. Since there are sensors before the CAT that are not
> giving an alarm, and there is a sensor after the CAT that is, AND I have
> faith that the CAT is a reliable component, I have to give my Best Guess
> on a failed sensor afgter the CAT. I would replace the sensor that is
> giving the alarm and hope the alarm goes off.
>

If one is going to attempt carpentry, one should have basic carpentry tools
on hand, including a tape measure to measure length. With a tape measure,
a carpenter can measure length instead of cutting boards until one fits. If
one is going to attempt automotive diagnostics, one should have basic
automotive tools on hand, including a volt/ohm meter to measure volts and
ohms. A perfectly servicable volt/ohm meter can be purchased at Radio Shack
for under $25. With a volt/ohm meter, one can measure voltage instead of
replacing parts until one works. That $25 investment in a volt/ohm meter
will save hundreds or even thousands of dollars by avoiding replacing good
parts. In my humble opinion, spending $25 on a meter that can be used for
checking just about every electrical component in a car is a reasonable
investment to help decide whether one should spend $50 on an aftermarket O2
sensor or even a $125 OEM sensor. Not only will you know whether or not the
sensor needs replacement, you will have a tool that will help check other
stuff in the future. I spent around $15 for my meter at Radio Shack almost
30 years ago, and as much as I would like a $400 Fluke meter, my cheapo
meter has never not worked for checking anything in a car.

Please think about and answer this a hypothetical question: You have 2
different O2 sensors, one in a blue car and one in a red car. The one in
the blue car is putting out a signal that meets factory specifications and
is rapidly cycling between 200 and 800 mV. The one in the red car is
putting out the same signal as the one in the blue car. Is the sensor in
the blue car good or bad?

To check your knowledge of how sensor #2 works, go to this link for on-line
test questions for the ASE test http://www.autoshop101.com/ and do questions
#7 and #17. The site lets you know whether your answers are correct or not.
In the scenario described in question #7, DTC P0420 would be set.

I don't expect everyone to know and understand the answer to question #7, so
in my desire to share my experience with and teach those who do not know, I
gave the CORRECT answer. My answer happens to agree with the National
Institute for Automotive Service Excellence, which is the body that tests
and certifies automotive technicians, with the factory serive manual, and I
suspect with Haynes, Chilton, and anyone else who actually understands how
DTC P0420 is set. Why do you insist in giving advice that is contrary to
the advice given by the factory and every legitimate source of automotive
information?
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)

 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
do_not_spam_me1

External


Since: Jan 23, 2005
Posts: 38



(Msg. 32) Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:54 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

wrote:

> It is raining today, on my way home, the check light turned on and I
> checked, it reads P0420. I just have CAT and 2 O2 sensors(front adn
> back) replaced about a month, how come?

Before replacing an O2 sensor, I would read their voltages, either
directly or through the car's computer. You'll need either an
oscilloscope (for electronics, not the kind for ignition systems) or a
digital voltage meter (don't use the analog type since it will load
down the sensor too much and slightly damage it). It's best if the
meter has a bar graph because that reacts much faster than the digits
display. The front O2 sensor should read about 1/2 volt AC on the
meter, or about 1 volt peak-peak on the oscilloscope. The rear sensor
should read the same if the catalytic converter doesn't work at all;
otherwise its voltage reading will be much lower, about 0.1V peak-peak.
You may be able to do a very rough check of the catalytic converter by
pointing an infrared thermometer at it. It should be hotter than the
exhaust pipe in front of it by at least tens of degrees.

 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
nonelson

External


Since: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 808



(Msg. 33) Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:55 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article ,
"Jeff Strickland" wrote:

> AND I have faith that the CAT
> is a reliable component,

Miss placed faith.
The OP has already stated that he did NOT opt for a genuine OEM
Toyota cat.
Fact; original equipment OBD2 certified catalytic convertors have
to by EPA rules, test at better than 75% efficiency.
Aftermarket catalytic convertors only test to 40% efficiency and
often times, a fair amount less.

The problem the OP is having is well known and discussed in the
emissions industry, that being; most aftermarket cats are no
where near efficient enough to meet the OBD2 monitoring criteria,
and in almost all cases, result in a failed repair which is
usually followed by mass parts swapping based on the flawed logic
that the new aftermarket cat -must- be doing its job so there
-must- be another failed component.
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jeff Strickland1

External


Since: Jun 27, 2003
Posts: 773



(Msg. 34) Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:55 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"aarcuda69062" wrote in message

> In article ,
> "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
>
>> AND I have faith that the CAT
>> is a reliable component,
>
> Miss placed faith.
> The OP has already stated that he did NOT opt for a genuine OEM
> Toyota cat.
> Fact; original equipment OBD2 certified catalytic convertors have
> to by EPA rules, test at better than 75% efficiency.
> Aftermarket catalytic convertors only test to 40% efficiency and
> often times, a fair amount less.
>
> The problem the OP is having is well known and discussed in the
> emissions industry, that being; most aftermarket cats are no
> where near efficient enough to meet the OBD2 monitoring criteria,
> and in almost all cases, result in a failed repair which is
> usually followed by mass parts swapping based on the flawed logic
> that the new aftermarket cat -must- be doing its job so there
> -must- be another failed component.


Agreed. My point is that he should never have replaced the CAT in the first
place. He had this code several weeks ago, and my suggestion then was to
replace only the after-CAT sensor. He elected to follow the advice of
another poster and spend more money than I would have spent to replace what
is normally a life item.

If I was getting a P0420 code, I would reset the computer and wait for
another occurance. If it came, then I'd replace the after-CAT sensor and
reset the computer again. If the code repeated at that point, then I'd learn
the troubleshooting procedure for the various sensors and wiring harness.

Now that the CAT has been replaced with an aftermarket part, all bets are
off. I agree that the new CAT might not work well, and if the sensor he
installed required him to splice in a new connector, then I'd suspect that
repair as well. In my humble opinion, he had a relatively easy problem that
has been blown out of proportion. I can't say with any certainty because I
am on the other side of the computer screen, but my gut feeling is that he
had a failed sensor that could have been replaced in less than 5 minutes,
but a different approach was taken. Now, I think he needs professional help
with good parts and diagnostic equipment.
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ray O

External


Since: Jun 02, 2006
Posts: 4627



(Msg. 35) Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:24 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Scott in Florida" wrote in message

> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:39:07 -0500, "Ray O"
> <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote:
>

<repetitive drivel snipped>

> I guess the only answer is to get you two a set of gloves...LOL
>
> I have to admit, I'm learning from both of you and grinnin a bit
> along the way....
>

LOL! You are learning from whoever is right and being confused by whoever
is wrong! <g>

This discussion is a lot like ones my wife and I have with my daughter Wink
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Scott in Florida

External


Since: Jun 05, 2006
Posts: 620



(Msg. 36) Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 9:58 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:39:07 -0500, "Ray O"
<rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote:

>
>"Jeff Strickland" wrote in message
>
>>
>><snipped>
>
>>>> I get HOW the sensor work, and what they are telling us. What I am
>>>> saying is that the after CAT sensor is saying the CAT is not working
>>>> right, but I maintain the CAT is fine and the after-CAT sensor itself is
>>>> failing.
>>>
>>> The facts don't match what you maintain, therefore you ignore the facts?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The exhaust stream going into the CAT is okay, but the stream coming out
>>>> is being reported as out of spec. If the stream is REPORTED as out of
>>>> spec, then the problem can be eitherb the CAT itself, or the sensor
>>>> making the report. The stream going into the CAT is within spec,
>>>> therefore there is no point in checking system components that adjust
>>>> the upstream exhaust contents.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How do you KNOW that the exhaust going into the cat is within spec?
>>>
>>
>> Because there is a sensor that says so. More accurately, there is a sensor
>> that does not say the exhaust stream is out of spec.
>>
>
>Which sensor checks whether the exhaust stream going into the cat is in or
>out of spec? What is it checking for?
>
>
>>> You may think that there is no point in checking system components that
>>> adjust the upstream exhaust components, however, the folks that designed
>>> and built the system think differently and so list several components and
>>> systems to check. I would trust their advice before I trusted your
>>> advice or my advice. I am simply relaying what the factory says to
>>> check.
>>>
>>
>> I would trust them too, but in the face of not having all of the
>> diagnostic tools at my disposal, I have to replace stuff at home using a
>> Best Guess method. Since there are sensors before the CAT that are not
>> giving an alarm, and there is a sensor after the CAT that is, AND I have
>> faith that the CAT is a reliable component, I have to give my Best Guess
>> on a failed sensor afgter the CAT. I would replace the sensor that is
>> giving the alarm and hope the alarm goes off.
>>
>
>If one is going to attempt carpentry, one should have basic carpentry tools
>on hand, including a tape measure to measure length. With a tape measure,
>a carpenter can measure length instead of cutting boards until one fits. If
>one is going to attempt automotive diagnostics, one should have basic
>automotive tools on hand, including a volt/ohm meter to measure volts and
>ohms. A perfectly servicable volt/ohm meter can be purchased at Radio Shack
>for under $25. With a volt/ohm meter, one can measure voltage instead of
>replacing parts until one works. That $25 investment in a volt/ohm meter
>will save hundreds or even thousands of dollars by avoiding replacing good
>parts. In my humble opinion, spending $25 on a meter that can be used for
>checking just about every electrical component in a car is a reasonable
>investment to help decide whether one should spend $50 on an aftermarket O2
>sensor or even a $125 OEM sensor. Not only will you know whether or not the
>sensor needs replacement, you will have a tool that will help check other
>stuff in the future. I spent around $15 for my meter at Radio Shack almost
>30 years ago, and as much as I would like a $400 Fluke meter, my cheapo
>meter has never not worked for checking anything in a car.
>
>Please think about and answer this a hypothetical question: You have 2
>different O2 sensors, one in a blue car and one in a red car. The one in
>the blue car is putting out a signal that meets factory specifications and
>is rapidly cycling between 200 and 800 mV. The one in the red car is
>putting out the same signal as the one in the blue car. Is the sensor in
>the blue car good or bad?
>
>To check your knowledge of how sensor #2 works, go to this link for on-line
>test questions for the ASE test http://www.autoshop101.com/ and do questions
>#7 and #17. The site lets you know whether your answers are correct or not.
>In the scenario described in question #7, DTC P0420 would be set.
>
>I don't expect everyone to know and understand the answer to question #7, so
>in my desire to share my experience with and teach those who do not know, I
>gave the CORRECT answer. My answer happens to agree with the National
>Institute for Automotive Service Excellence, which is the body that tests
>and certifies automotive technicians, with the factory serive manual, and I
>suspect with Haynes, Chilton, and anyone else who actually understands how
>DTC P0420 is set. Why do you insist in giving advice that is contrary to
>the advice given by the factory and every legitimate source of automotive
>information?

I guess the only answer is to get you two a set of gloves...LOL

I have to admit, I'm learning from both of you and grinnin a bit
along the way....




--

Scott in Florida
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bruce L. Bergman

External


Since: Feb 05, 2005
Posts: 238



(Msg. 37) Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:57 am
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:25:37 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
wrote:
>"Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message
>
>> "doncee" wrote in message
>>

>>> Just to add fuel to the bad firmware theory, have a friend who
>>> had this problem on '02 Corolla. Chk light was reset & drove the
>>> vehicle 7 to 10 days to allow the computer recycle then took it
>>> for emission inspection & passed with flying colors. If in fact
>>> the CAT or the mixture being emited was actually bad would not
>>> the vehicle failed emissions??
>>
>> No, because emissions checks on vehicles with OBD II do not actually
>> sample the emissions. An emissions check on an OBD II vehicle involves
>> plugging a code reader into the OBD II port and reading the contents of
>> the vehicle's computer to make sure that it is ready and has not detected
>> a problem for the past 2 drive cycles. If the vehicle has been driven for
>> 2 drive cycles without detecting an error, then it is "ready," and will
>> pass the emissions check.
>>
>>> Chk Eng light has come on since
>>> & been reset & stays off for several weeks or months before it
>>> comes on again. Am certainly no expert but this intermitent
>>> behavior certainly sounds like some sort of false\positive &\or
>>> computer problem.
>>> dc
>>
>> Most diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) have 2-trip detection logic, where the
>> electronic control module (ECM or computer) has to detect a problem on 2
>> consecutive drive cycles, or trips. If the ECM does not detect the
>> problem on 2 consecutive trips, it will turn the malfunction indicator
>> light (MIL or check engine light) off. A marginal problem can make the
>> MIL go on and off.
>
>I don't know where you live, but in California, they put a probe in the
>exhaust pipe to actually measure the exhaust stream coming out. They do
>other stuff too, but they ALWAYS measure the exhaust output at the tailpipe
>using a probe.

California does BOTH - first the Testing Computer scans the Car's
ECM Computer and looks for either the AOK code that the engine has
completed two complete drive cycles successfully with no codes set
(which won't be there if the car ECM was reset just before the test in
an attempt to try sneaking by) or for any trouble codes that have been
set.

If it fails that part, there's no sense going any further.

After that step is passed they call for a visual check for tampering
with under hood systems or hacking out cat converters, tampered
evaporative emissions systems, bad gas cap seals, etc.

And only after you pass all that THEN they call for the sniffer
probe to be inserted in the tailpipe and a short drive cycle on a
chassis dynamometer, to see if the ECM's idea of 'Normal' meets with
reality.

--<< Bruce >>--
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
wenmang

External


Since: Nov 30, 2005
Posts: 59



(Msg. 38) Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:14 am
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Thanks everybody. I indeed purchased OEM O2 sensors from Toyota
Dealer(online) and both sensors were installed along with aftermarket
CAT. After a week of installation, my car has everything(monitors)
cleared and it passed Pa state inspection. The problem came back after
about 2 weeks of driving since then. The check light is back with P0420
code. The local exhause shop where I had everything installed could not
believe my story and they kept saying that it was almost impossible to
have CAT going bad like that, and they insisted that they hardly saw
CAT defective(1 out of hundreds they installed, maybe). They asked me
to provide the proof by going to Dealer and have it checked. If Dealer
says CAT is bad, they will honor the warranty of CAT. I just cleared
code this weenend, still waiting drive cycle is done. I will send it to
dealer if check light is back, and keep you posted the outcome.


On Oct 16, 11:17 am, aarcuda69062 wrote:
> In article ,
> "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
>
> > > The problem the OP is having is well known and discussed in the
> > > emissions industry, that being; most aftermarket cats are no
> > > where near efficient enough to meet the OBD2 monitoring criteria,
> > > and in almost all cases, result in a failed repair which is
> > > usually followed by mass parts swapping based on the flawed logic
> > > that the new aftermarket cat -must- be doing its job so there
> > > -must- be another failed component.
>
> > Agreed. My point is that he should never have replaced the CAT in the first
> > place. He had this code several weeks ago, and my suggestion then was to
> > replace only the after-CAT sensor. He elected to follow the advice of
> > another poster and spend more money than I would have spent to replace what
> > is normally a life item.He had diagnostics from two different shops, one a Toyota
> dealership that indicated that the cat-con was no longer
> functioning.
> Catalytic convertors do not last forever, that is why you can buy
> replacements. Trick is to buy the -right- replacement.
>
> > If I was getting a P0420 code, I would reset the computer and wait for
> > another occurance. If it came, then I'd replace the after-CAT sensor and
> > reset the computer again. If the code repeated at that point, then I'd learn
> > the troubleshooting procedure for the various sensors and wiring harness.If I had a code P0420, I'd use my scan tool to do some dynamic
> testing of the oxygen sensors involved. If I force the fuel
> system rich and lean and the oxygen sensors respond accordingly,
> then the sensors are functioning as they should be.
>
> > Now that the CAT has been replaced with an aftermarket part, all bets are
> > off. I agree that the new CAT might not work well, and if the sensor he
> > installed required him to splice in a new connector, then I'd suspect that
> > repair as well.I believe that he mentioned in one of his earlier posts that he
> bought genuine Toyota sensors on line and saved $40 per sensor
> doing so.
>
> > In my humble opinion, he had a relatively easy problem that
> > has been blown out of proportion. I can't say with any certainty because I
> > am on the other side of the computer screen, but my gut feeling is that he
> > had a failed sensor that could have been replaced in less than 5 minutes,
> > but a different approach was taken. Now, I think he needs professional help
> > with good parts and diagnostic equipment.I think that originally, he got ambiguous advice from the
> Firestone store which then planted the seed of doubt when he went
> to the dealership. At 150K miles, I wouldn't want to give any
> warranty on a job like this when there's a good chance that the
> O2 sensors are original or very high mileage, so the
> recommendation that both be replaced is sound business management.
>
> There are plenty of trouble codes that will identify a stuck
> high, stuck low, lazy, open, or shorted O2 sensor, hell, Nissans
> have their share of post cat o2 sensor failures, but they don't
> flag a P0420 when it happens.
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Scott in Florida

External


Since: Jun 05, 2006
Posts: 620



(Msg. 39) Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 9:55 am
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 20:24:07 -0500, "Ray O"
<rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote:

>
>"Scott in Florida" wrote in message
>
>> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 15:39:07 -0500, "Ray O"
>> <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote:
>>
>
><repetitive drivel snipped>
>
>> I guess the only answer is to get you two a set of gloves...LOL
>>
>> I have to admit, I'm learning from both of you and grinnin a bit
>> along the way....
>>
>
>LOL! You are learning from whoever is right and being confused by whoever
>is wrong! <g>
>

LOL....I know who is right, but it is entertaining to watch the
back/forth...


>This discussion is a lot like ones my wife and I have with my daughter Wink

LOL....

Kids are that way....

Some arguments you don't/can't win....


--

Scott in Florida
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
nonelson

External


Since: Nov 12, 2004
Posts: 808



(Msg. 40) Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:55 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article ,
"Jeff Strickland" wrote:

> > The problem the OP is having is well known and discussed in the
> > emissions industry, that being; most aftermarket cats are no
> > where near efficient enough to meet the OBD2 monitoring criteria,
> > and in almost all cases, result in a failed repair which is
> > usually followed by mass parts swapping based on the flawed logic
> > that the new aftermarket cat -must- be doing its job so there
> > -must- be another failed component.
>
>
> Agreed. My point is that he should never have replaced the CAT in the first
> place. He had this code several weeks ago, and my suggestion then was to
> replace only the after-CAT sensor. He elected to follow the advice of
> another poster and spend more money than I would have spent to replace what
> is normally a life item.

He had diagnostics from two different shops, one a Toyota
dealership that indicated that the cat-con was no longer
functioning.
Catalytic convertors do not last forever, that is why you can buy
replacements. Trick is to buy the -right- replacement.

> If I was getting a P0420 code, I would reset the computer and wait for
> another occurance. If it came, then I'd replace the after-CAT sensor and
> reset the computer again. If the code repeated at that point, then I'd learn
> the troubleshooting procedure for the various sensors and wiring harness.

If I had a code P0420, I'd use my scan tool to do some dynamic
testing of the oxygen sensors involved. If I force the fuel
system rich and lean and the oxygen sensors respond accordingly,
then the sensors are functioning as they should be.

> Now that the CAT has been replaced with an aftermarket part, all bets are
> off. I agree that the new CAT might not work well, and if the sensor he
> installed required him to splice in a new connector, then I'd suspect that
> repair as well.

I believe that he mentioned in one of his earlier posts that he
bought genuine Toyota sensors on line and saved $40 per sensor
doing so.

> In my humble opinion, he had a relatively easy problem that
> has been blown out of proportion. I can't say with any certainty because I
> am on the other side of the computer screen, but my gut feeling is that he
> had a failed sensor that could have been replaced in less than 5 minutes,
> but a different approach was taken. Now, I think he needs professional help
> with good parts and diagnostic equipment.

I think that originally, he got ambiguous advice from the
Firestone store which then planted the seed of doubt when he went
to the dealership. At 150K miles, I wouldn't want to give any
warranty on a job like this when there's a good chance that the
O2 sensors are original or very high mileage, so the
recommendation that both be replaced is sound business management.

There are plenty of trouble codes that will identify a stuck
high, stuck low, lazy, open, or shorted O2 sensor, hell, Nissans
have their share of post cat o2 sensor failures, but they don't
flag a P0420 when it happens.
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
wenmang

External


Since: Nov 30, 2005
Posts: 59



(Msg. 41) Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:22 am
Post subject: Update - P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Just came from Toyota Dealer, CAT is found "not operating properly" and
need replacement.
So, I think that the aftermarket CAT is indeed a bad one. The local
exhaust shop was recommended by our local Firestone auto shop and I
paid only $157 for CAT(including the labor, not including the O2
sensors). Now, I am wondering whether the CAT is too cheap to function
properly? what will happen to next one? Local Midas auto shop asked
>$500 for CAT, the local exhaust shop is much cheaper than Midas, not sure that it was a good move for me at first place. I can not decide to ask money back from the exhaust shop and go somewhere else or just go ahead and ask them to install a new one under their warranty? Any adivce?


On Oct 16, 12:14 pm, " " wrote:
> Thanks everybody. I indeed purchased OEM O2 sensors from Toyota
> Dealer(online) and both sensors were installed along with aftermarket
> CAT. After a week of installation, my car has everything(monitors)
> cleared and it passed Pa state inspection. The problem came back after
> about 2 weeks of driving since then. The check light is back with P0420
> code. The local exhause shop where I had everything installed could not
> believe my story and they kept saying that it was almost impossible to
> have CAT going bad like that, and they insisted that they hardly saw
> CAT defective(1 out of hundreds they installed, maybe). They asked me
> to provide the proof by going to Dealer and have it checked. If Dealer
> says CAT is bad, they will honor the warranty of CAT. I just cleared
> code this weenend, still waiting drive cycle is done. I will send it to
> dealer if check light is back, and keep you posted the outcome.
>
> On Oct 16, 11:17 am, aarcuda69062 wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article ,
> > "Jeff Strickland" wrote:
>
> > > > The problem the OP is having is well known and discussed in the
> > > > emissions industry, that being; most aftermarket cats are no
> > > > where near efficient enough to meet the OBD2 monitoring criteria,
> > > > and in almost all cases, result in a failed repair which is
> > > > usually followed by mass parts swapping based on the flawed logic
> > > > that the new aftermarket cat -must- be doing its job so there
> > > > -must- be another failed component.
>
> > > Agreed. My point is that he should never have replaced the CAT in the first
> > > place. He had this code several weeks ago, and my suggestion then was to
> > > replace only the after-CAT sensor. He elected to follow the advice of
> > > another poster and spend more money than I would have spent to replace what
> > > is normally a life item.He had diagnostics from two different shops, one a Toyota
> > dealership that indicated that the cat-con was no longer
> > functioning.
> > Catalytic convertors do not last forever, that is why you can buy
> > replacements. Trick is to buy the -right- replacement.
>
> > > If I was getting a P0420 code, I would reset the computer and wait for
> > > another occurance. If it came, then I'd replace the after-CAT sensor and
> > > reset the computer again. If the code repeated at that point, then I'd learn
> > > the troubleshooting procedure for the various sensors and wiring harness.If I had a code P0420, I'd use my scan tool to do some dynamic
> > testing of the oxygen sensors involved. If I force the fuel
> > system rich and lean and the oxygen sensors respond accordingly,
> > then the sensors are functioning as they should be.
>
> > > Now that the CAT has been replaced with an aftermarket part, all bets are
> > > off. I agree that the new CAT might not work well, and if the sensor he
> > > installed required him to splice in a new connector, then I'd suspect that
> > > repair as well.I believe that he mentioned in one of his earlier posts that he
> > bought genuine Toyota sensors on line and saved $40 per sensor
> > doing so.
>
> > > In my humble opinion, he had a relatively easy problem that
> > > has been blown out of proportion. I can't say with any certainty because I
> > > am on the other side of the computer screen, but my gut feeling is that he
> > > had a failed sensor that could have been replaced in less than 5 minutes,
> > > but a different approach was taken. Now, I think he needs professional help
> > > with good parts and diagnostic equipment.I think that originally, he got ambiguous advice from the
> > Firestone store which then planted the seed of doubt when he went
> > to the dealership. At 150K miles, I wouldn't want to give any
> > warranty on a job like this when there's a good chance that the
> > O2 sensors are original or very high mileage, so the
> > recommendation that both be replaced is sound business management.
>
> > There are plenty of trouble codes that will identify a stuck
> > high, stuck low, lazy, open, or shorted O2 sensor, hell, Nissans
> > have their share of post cat o2 sensor failures, but they don't
> > flag a P0420 when it happens.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ray O

External


Since: Jun 02, 2006
Posts: 4627



(Msg. 42) Posted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 10:56 am
Post subject: Re: Update - P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

wrote in message

> Just came from Toyota Dealer, CAT is found "not operating properly" and
> need replacement.
> So, I think that the aftermarket CAT is indeed a bad one. The local
> exhaust shop was recommended by our local Firestone auto shop and I
> paid only $157 for CAT(including the labor, not including the O2
> sensors). Now, I am wondering whether the CAT is too cheap to function
> properly? what will happen to next one? Local Midas auto shop asked
>>$500 for CAT, the local exhaust shop is much cheaper than Midas, not sure
>>that it was a good move for me at first place. I can not decide to ask
>>money back from the exhaust shop and go somewhere else or just go ahead
>>and ask them to install a new one under their warranty? Any adivce?
>

As I've mentioned many times and contrary to what some others incorrectly
think, it is just about impossible to have a false P0420 code due to a bad
O2 sensor #2, so the most likely cause is a bad catalytic converter.

One of the primary "ingredients" in a catalytic converter is platinum, which
is one of the reasons why a catalytic converter is so expensive. The only
way I can think of to get a cat that much cheaper than an OEM one is to use
a lot less platinum. In my opinion, in the case of catalytic converters,
you get what you pay for.

My advice depends on how much longer you intend to keep the car. If you are
only going to keep it for 3 years or less, then go back to the place that
installed it and ask for a replacement under their warranty. If you are
going to keep it for 3 to 5 years, then go to a place like Midas, and if you
are going to keep it longer than that, then get one from a Toyota dealer.
--

Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Jeff Strickland1

External


Since: Jun 27, 2003
Posts: 773



(Msg. 43) Posted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 6:14 pm
Post subject: Re: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bruce L. Bergman" wrote in message

> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 12:25:37 -0700, "Jeff Strickland"
> wrote:
>>"Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message
>>
>>> "doncee" wrote in message
>>>
>
>>>> Just to add fuel to the bad firmware theory, have a friend who
>>>> had this problem on '02 Corolla. Chk light was reset & drove the
>>>> vehicle 7 to 10 days to allow the computer recycle then took it
>>>> for emission inspection & passed with flying colors. If in fact
>>>> the CAT or the mixture being emited was actually bad would not
>>>> the vehicle failed emissions??
>>>
>>> No, because emissions checks on vehicles with OBD II do not actually
>>> sample the emissions. An emissions check on an OBD II vehicle involves
>>> plugging a code reader into the OBD II port and reading the contents of
>>> the vehicle's computer to make sure that it is ready and has not
>>> detected
>>> a problem for the past 2 drive cycles. If the vehicle has been driven
>>> for
>>> 2 drive cycles without detecting an error, then it is "ready," and will
>>> pass the emissions check.
>>>
>>>> Chk Eng light has come on since
>>>> & been reset & stays off for several weeks or months before it
>>>> comes on again. Am certainly no expert but this intermitent
>>>> behavior certainly sounds like some sort of false\positive &\or
>>>> computer problem.
>>>> dc
>>>
>>> Most diagnostic trouble codes (DTC) have 2-trip detection logic, where
>>> the
>>> electronic control module (ECM or computer) has to detect a problem on 2
>>> consecutive drive cycles, or trips. If the ECM does not detect the
>>> problem on 2 consecutive trips, it will turn the malfunction indicator
>>> light (MIL or check engine light) off. A marginal problem can make the
>>> MIL go on and off.
>>
>>I don't know where you live, but in California, they put a probe in the
>>exhaust pipe to actually measure the exhaust stream coming out. They do
>>other stuff too, but they ALWAYS measure the exhaust output at the
>>tailpipe
>>using a probe.
>
> California does BOTH - first the Testing Computer scans the Car's
> ECM Computer and looks for either the AOK code that the engine has
> completed two complete drive cycles successfully with no codes set
> (which won't be there if the car ECM was reset just before the test in
> an attempt to try sneaking by) or for any trouble codes that have been
> set.
>
> If it fails that part, there's no sense going any further.
>
> After that step is passed they call for a visual check for tampering
> with under hood systems or hacking out cat converters, tampered
> evaporative emissions systems, bad gas cap seals, etc.
>
> And only after you pass all that THEN they call for the sniffer
> probe to be inserted in the tailpipe and a short drive cycle on a
> chassis dynamometer, to see if the ECM's idea of 'Normal' meets with
> reality.
>



Thanks for the clarification, I knew that. I was only responding to what
appeared to be a statement that only codes are scanned. In CA, codes are
scanned and there is the sniff test.
 >> Stay informed about: P0420 comes back after CAT and O2 sensors replaced 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
P0420 code and PA state inspection - I have P0420 faulty code issue for over 6 months, and now it is the time for PA state inspection. I talked to some guys at Firestone auto shop and was told that both O2 sensors need to be replaced along with catalytic converter in order to ensure..

Just replaced starter on 93 Camry, but still won't turn over - I just repalced the starter on my 93 Toyota Camry LE. Upon replacing it, the car started just fine and would continue to do so for about a week. Then one time after having started it earlier that morning, the car would not turn over. If I turn the key...

Heater lukewarm after coolant replaced - I just had the coolant replaced on my 2003 Matrix (33k miles) and I noticed that when I drive my car the heater air is lukewarm for about 3-5 minutes and then abruptly it gets hot. I'm not 100% positive but I think before I had the coolant replaced,..

When should the timing belt be replaced for a Camry? - At what mileage, or how often, should the timing belt for a 2000 Camry CE be changed?

06 RAV4 question, sensors on dash, what are they? - On my 06 RAV4 (Limeted) there are 2 sensors on the dash in front of the driver. Does anybody know what they are? I asked the sales droid when I bought it and he didn't know. I noticed that these were called out while looking for a dash cover so I imaging...
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Toyota All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]