"DaveW" <yzfr1ny RemoveThis @yahoooo.com> wrote in message
> >[snip ...]
> You're way out on that limb. This whole concept of "driver's car" is a
> little fuzzy to me - is it more desirable to have a harsher
> suspension, hard seats and more noise in everyday traffic conditions?
> I don't race on public streets, and like most M3 owners, my car will
> never see a racetrack.
I agree, everyone has their own tastes, likes and dislikes.
Hmmm, so a "driver's car" equates to racing on public streets?
I suspect many of those who prefer a "driver's car" want a car
that communicates what it's doing, and one that is dependably
responsive to their input.
I think your statement about a "driver's car" concept being fuzzy
is a bit disingenuous, though. You know what we're talking about,
and you know, however good your Lexus is, that it doesn't fit the bill
in that respect. If those attributes don't matter much to you, fine.
Just don't pretend that there's something wrong with people who do
appreciate them, or that your vehicle is superior. It isn't.
How's this: a driver's car is fun to drive, for those who enjoy that sort of
thing?
For others, we have Buicks ...
And Lexus ...
Sorry, Buick owners, that was unfair.
Ha ha.
>> Stay informed about: How are these Japanese luxury brands doing these days?