Ford Invests $155 Million In Fuel-Efficient V-6

In article <be016076-8506-4ef3-8d24-6c083e5f63fb@
33g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>, says...
>
> On Feb 27, 4:46 pm, bob urz wrote:
> > http://www.impomag.com/scripts/ShowPR.asp?RID=13358&CommonCount=0
> >
> > bob
>
> I Must be old, because I still think it needs 8 cylinders...
>
> But hats off to the fuel efficiency. Just wish they wouldn't put v6's
> in mustangs.

Except the new V6 for the 2011+ models makes more power than many of the
classic V8's, especially if you adjust between the old gross and newer
net/certified.

--
If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
http://home.comcast.net/~andyross
 >> Stay informed about: Ford Invests $155 Million In Fuel-Efficient V-6 

Picasso wrote:
> On Feb 27, 4:46 pm, bob urz wrote:
>> http://www.impomag.com/scripts/ShowPR.asp?RID=13358&CommonCount=0
>>
>> bob
>
> I Must be old, because I still think it needs 8 cylinders...
>
> But hats off to the fuel efficiency. Just wish they wouldn't put v6's
> in mustangs.

I think the only reason they did this was a knee jerk reaction to the
high HP v6 in the camaro and its surging sales. Its the 60's all over
again in a small way.

bob
 >> Stay informed about: Ford Invests $155 Million In Fuel-Efficient V-6 

The 2011 Mustang V6 has more HP than then 2010 V8, but the 2011 V8 is up to
415 HP with BETTER fuel mileage as well



"Picasso" wrote in message

On Feb 27, 4:46 pm, bob urz wrote:
> http://www.impomag.com/scripts/ShowPR.asp?RID=13358&CommonCount=0
>
> bob

I Must be old, because I still think it needs 8 cylinders...

But hats off to the fuel efficiency. Just wish they wouldn't put v6's
in mustangs.
 >> Stay informed about: Ford Invests $155 Million In Fuel-Efficient V-6