Welcome to AutoBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Ethanol conversion?

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Subaru RSS
Related Topics:
service manual - HI I need a service manual for subaru forester 1998, could you help me where I can find it? Maybe you have on pdf file. Thank you

Spend $60 on coolant leaking check? - Hi there, My forester 2001 now has an annoying coolant leak. I know the recall on head gasket problem so I just did a coolant flush about one and half months ago and asked the dealer to add the subaru However, now it's still same as before. I..

head gasket blow or something else - HI I have subaru forester 1998, 110k miles. Problem is with air presure from ciliner is blowing out coolant water. Cost to fix it is abbout $1600 it is to much to me. I have some with car, but I don know do I have to take engine out to change..

86 GL leaky pan gasket - It's gone from a couple drips to puddles. Any way to get it off without pulling the motor? The 4 back screws have me stumped. Thanks Mark

Unleaded smell - I have always had a whiff of rotten egg gas whenever heavily in my 05 OB. Lately however the smell is more evident even when driving normally around town. The car is going in for its 37500 klm service shortly and was wondering if anybody..
Next:  JustAutoParts - a place to find automotive parts ..  
Author Message
Uncle Ben

External


Since: Apr 28, 2007
Posts: 81



(Msg. 61) Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:54 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>autos>subaru (more info?)

On May 20, 7:59 pm, "Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)"
<DwightSchr....RemoveThis@DunderMifflin.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <b....RemoveThis@greenba.com>
> wrote:

> >Congratulations!  My GF's Porsche will do it in even less.  
>
> Which Porsche?

I'll have to ask.

 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
"Valued Corporate #120,34

External


Since: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 20



(Msg. 62) Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 7:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

This message is not archived

 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
clare at snyder dot ontar

External


Since: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 53



(Msg. 63) Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 9:16 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:15:31 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <ben.RemoveThis@greenba.com>
wrote:

>On May 20, 4:32 pm, "dnoyeB" <as....RemoveThis@fake.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2008 21:06:16 -0700, -rick- wrote:
>> > L. Ross Raszewski wrote:
>>
>> >> Just as a data point, I started routinely using E15 about a month ago,
>> >> and noticed a consistant 20% *increase* in mileage.
>>
>> > ???
>>
>> > I get about 10% less mpg with 10% ethanol.  Some of that is
>> > temperature.
>>
>> Makes no sense.  Means ethanol contributed nothing
>> toward your mpg. You would get the same thing if you put 10% less fuel in
>> the tank. Which would cost you 10% less.
>
>Makes a lot of sense. Suppose I invent a fuel that gets you 200 mpg,
>but it costs $200 per gallon. Would you go for it? No. MPG isn't the
>object; it's MPD: miles per dollar.
>
>On E60 (on my way to E85) I get 15% less mpg, but it costs 25% less.
>That means I am getting 13% more miles/dollar than on gasoline. The
>calculation is (1-0.15)/(1-0.25) = 0.85/0.75 = 1.13.
>
>Not to mention that with ethanol I pollute less, I cause less money to
>flow to bad people, and I enjoy driving more, because I get higher
>torque and higher horsepower. My old 1999 OB goes 0 - 60 mph in under
>12.5 seconds.
>
>Ben
And if I drive a little puddlejumper that gets 65MPG on low octane
pump gas, I run cheaper than you per mile, AND pollute less.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Rick Courtright

External


Since: Jan 12, 2004
Posts: 227



(Msg. 64) Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:36 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Uncle Ben wrote:

> Not to mention that with ethanol I pollute less, I cause less money to
> flow to bad people, and I enjoy driving more, because I get higher
> torque and higher horsepower. My old 1999 OB goes 0 - 60 mph in under
> 12.5 seconds.

Hi,

Well, I guess all that's left is to gather around the campfire and all
sing "Kumbaya!"

You pollute less? What were the emissions test results before the switch
and what were they after? Were the emissions tested for "new" polluting
compounds that could result from the burning of ethanol vs. gasoline?

You cause less money to flow to bad people? Who ARE these bad people?

You get higher torque and higher horsepower? What were the figures on
both before the switch, and what are they afterward?

You get a 0-60 time under 12.5 seconds? What was the time before the
switch? What was the car rated for when it was new?

What's that funny feeling in my shorts? Surely it's not someone trying
to blow greenhouse gases up me bum?

Not to belittle your efforts and whatever interesting results may come
from them, but I haven't seen anything that really convinces me you've
improved upon your previous lot in life. How 'bout some numbers?

Rick
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Uncle Ben

External


Since: Apr 28, 2007
Posts: 81



(Msg. 65) Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 5:39 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 21, 4:36 am, Rick Courtright <rcourtri... DeleteThis @iname.com> wrote:
....
> Not to belittle your efforts and whatever interesting results may come
> from them, but I haven't seen anything that really convinces me you've
> improved upon your previous lot in life. How 'bout some numbers?
>
> Rick

Rick, I don't have all those numbers. I, like you, approach these
matters with a "show me" attitude. Even if I had the numbers, you
should not be persuaded by them. It is characteristic of this
wonderful medium we are using that you shouldn't trust anybody. You
have no way of knowing that I am not a teen-aged boy making all this
up for the pleasure of fooling you.

Actually, I am very old, a retired physics professor who is worried
about the world my grandchildren will live in. We are not running out
of oil, but we are running out of cheap oil. When gasoline goes to
$15 per gallon, we won't be driving around very much unless we have an
alternative to gasoline. You won't be getting food at your supermarket
trucked all the way across the country. You may have to move out into
the coutryside to live near a farmer who will sell you part of his
crop. Our world is going to change drastically. The population of
the US and the world is likely to shrink.

So that is why I am interested in the potential of biofuels to
mitigate the disaster that awaits us. I cannot persuade you to use
ethanol. I am not that powerful. What I can do is to point you to
sources you may trust slightly that will make you willing to try some
things for yourself. You will be the best witness to their truth.

First, google "ethanol Brazil" and read their 30-year history.
Brazil is requiring gas stations to provide ethanol/gasoline at 24%
concentration even for unmodified cars. There are many flex-fuel cars
there that can burn E85. Brazil produces ethanol from sugar cane at
about 83 cents per gallon. (We could too, someday.) Sugar cane is a
much better feedstock than corn.

Next, google "E85 Albany NY". You will see a list of gas stations in
the state that sell E85. Notice that there are several sources that
an ordinary person cannot buy from; "no public access". That is
because the state of NY has fleets of vehicles that run on E85 and
they use these depots to keep them running.

Then look online for the acronym NYSERDA, which stands for NYS Energy
Research and Development Agency, and you will find, if you look hard
enough, that NYS will subsidize you, the gas station owner, with many
thousands of dollars to install an E85 pump.

I understand that Minnesota has gone much farther than NY to push for
ethanol use, but NY is where I live and what I know more about.

There are some states that have no E85 stations. If your state has
none, you may not be able to do the experiment I am going to
describe. It is what I did. I'm glad I did.

If your car is no longer under warranty, you may be bold enough to try
putting a little E85 into its tank. My experiment found that a
concentration of 40% (E40) is too much; my check-engine light came
on after 70 miles. I wasn't worried, because I had seen on YouTube a
breakdown (by a college lab) of an engine that had run 102,000 miles
on straight E85 without any conversion attempt, and it was fine.
(Alcohol burns cooler than gasoline, so the threat of engine burnout
because of fuel leanness was reduced.)

I just added a few gallons of E10 to reduce the concentration to E29.
Within a few miles, the light went out.

You don't have to do this with a full tank, as I did. If you are more
cautious, you can try with a smaller amount, as long as you can
estimate how much gasoline is in your tank when you add the E85.

I was surprised at how peppy my car seemed to be. It is an old car --
1999 Outback -- but it seemed to be young again and eager to run. I
wish I had measured its 0-60 time before, but it was too late. Maybe
somone else has a 1999 OB with 150,000 miles on it, well maintained,
and will do this measwurement. Otherwise, I'll do it some day. It is
not trivial to change fuels, because you always have some of the old
fuel left in the tank diluting what you put in.

I didn't expect the improvement in performance, or I would have made
the "before" measurements.

Since then I have learned (and you can verify online) that E85 has an
octane rating of 104 -- a fuel with higher octane than premium but
costing less than regular. If you search around a bit, you will find
other people who report an improvement in performance. In fact, 100%
methanol is a racing fuel. But even in my old car, the ECU is smart
enough to advance the timing a lot so as to take advantage of the
higher octane.

You will get lower mpg's, but if the price of E85 is like what I am
paying -- 25% less than regular -- you will likely be getting more
miles per dollar. We are still in the early days of E85.

Now I have converted my car to flex-fuel with a little box that
streches the pulse to the fuel injectors. I am up to E60 now, and the
next fill will take me close enough to call it E85. (See
Change2E85.com. Their converter is now EPA approved, they say. Their
customer service is excellent.) The conversion is reversible, so if I
buy a new car, I will move the converter to it.



This post is long enough now. If you are as motivated as I am to
solve the liquid fuel problem we are facing, you will take a chance,
try my experiment, and draw your own conclusions. You are your best
persuader.

Uncle Ben
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Uncle Ben

External


Since: Apr 28, 2007
Posts: 81



(Msg. 66) Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 6:30 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 20, 8:54 pm, Uncle Ben <b....TakeThisOut@greenba.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 7:59 pm, "Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)"
>
> <DwightSchr....TakeThisOut@DunderMifflin.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <b....TakeThisOut@greenba.com>
> > wrote:
> > >Congratulations!  My GF's Porsche will do it in even less.  
>
> > Which Porsche?
>
> I'll have to ask.

It's a 928 from 1979. I haven't actually measured its 0-60 time, so I
should not have made the hasty claim. But it sure snaps my head back
when you floor it.

Ben
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Uncle Ben

External


Since: Apr 28, 2007
Posts: 81



(Msg. 67) Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 8:45 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 21, 9:30 am, Uncle Ben <b... RemoveThis @greenba.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 8:54 pm, Uncle Ben <b... RemoveThis @greenba.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 20, 7:59 pm, "Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)"
>
> > <DwightSchr... RemoveThis @DunderMifflin.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 May 2008 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <b... RemoveThis @greenba.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >Congratulations!  My GF's Porsche will do it in even less.  
>
> > > Which Porsche?
>
> > I'll have to ask.
>
> It's a 928 from 1979.  I haven't actually measured its 0-60 time, so I
> should not have made the hasty claim.  But it sure snaps my head back
> when you floor it.
>
> Ben

According to http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/1224/index.html
the 928 with std. transmission has acceleration 0-100 km/hr: 5.9 sec.
That's 62.1 mph. At constant acceleration that makes 0-60 mph: 5.7 sec
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Carl 1 Lucky Texan

External


Since: Jan 20, 2004
Posts: 978



(Msg. 68) Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 9:30 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Rick Courtright wrote:

> Uncle Ben wrote:
>
>
>>Not to mention that with ethanol I pollute less, I cause less money to
>>flow to bad people, and I enjoy driving more, because I get higher
>>torque and higher horsepower. My old 1999 OB goes 0 - 60 mph in under
>>12.5 seconds.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Well, I guess all that's left is to gather around the campfire and all
> sing "Kumbaya!"
>
> You pollute less? What were the emissions test results before the switch
> and what were they after? Were the emissions tested for "new" polluting
> compounds that could result from the burning of ethanol vs. gasoline?
>
> You cause less money to flow to bad people? Who ARE these bad people?
>
> You get higher torque and higher horsepower? What were the figures on
> both before the switch, and what are they afterward?
>
> You get a 0-60 time under 12.5 seconds? What was the time before the
> switch? What was the car rated for when it was new?
>
> What's that funny feeling in my shorts? Surely it's not someone trying
> to blow greenhouse gases up me bum?
>
> Not to belittle your efforts and whatever interesting results may come
> from them, but I haven't seen anything that really convinces me you've
> improved upon your previous lot in life. How 'bout some numbers?
>
> Rick

I seem to recall formaldehyde being a 'new' pollutant from alcohol? Not
sure anyone knows what that will do, unless the Brazilians have some data.
Even IF ethanol is not hugely water intensive to make. IF it has no
transportation issues, IF it's 'really' cheaper to produce, etc. It
should not require a subsidy from ME to provide experimental fuel to
someone else. Let it compete (btw - if there are subsidies for fossil
fuels, I'm equally opposed to those) in the open market. I'm just not
convinced. Ethanol has only about 65% the BTU per volume as gasoline it
CAN NOT be as 'efficient'. Either range or mileage MUST suffer. For the
same reason diesel has better mileage than gas - more BTU/volume.

No question it can be made to work, and perhaps cellulosic production
will alleviate the food/fuel problem as well as some of the production
costs and water usage issues. IT STILL will only be a stop gap measure
unless combined as a hybrid (or???) with a technology capable of
regenerative braking(compressed air, hydraulic
accumulators,electricity). Of those technologies, it's hard to imagine
our great grandchildren NOT using electricity as the prime mover for
personal autos.

Carl


--
to reply, change ( .not) to ( .net)
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Uncle Ben

External


Since: Apr 28, 2007
Posts: 81



(Msg. 69) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 6:45 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 21, 10:30 pm, Carl 1 Lucky Texan <alcky... RemoveThis @swbell.not> wrote:

...
It [ethanol}
> should not require a subsidy from ME to provide experimental fuel to
> someone else. Let it compete.

In general, Carl, I agree. But there is a chicken and egg problem
here. Why offer E85 for sale if there are so few FFV's out there?
And why buy an FFV if there are so few places to buy E85. The
Brazilian solution to this problem in the 1970-1980 period was
dictatorial: require stations to offer ethanol. Today they are
energy independent.

That would never fly here. In New York State, they offer a subsidy to
stations to install E85 pumps. So here in the Capital District (pop.
1 million +) there are four stations offering E85 and one more "coming
soon." In some states there are none at all.

> Ethanol has only about 65% the BTU per volume as gasoline it
> CAN NOT be as 'efficient'. Either range or mileage MUST suffer. For the
> same reason diesel has better mileage than gas - more BTU/volume.

True if you only count miles per gallon as your measure. I get 15%
less mpg than on gasoline. But since E85 sells for 25% less than
gasoline, I am ahead on miles per dollar: 13% ahead, if you calculate
it correctly.

E85 also has an octane rating of 104 -- higher than premium, cheaper
than regular. When cars are designed to exploit this, the fuel
penalty will be greatly reduced. In turbocharged cars it already is.
I find my converted E85 car (1999 OB) runs well and has better
acceleration than on gasoline. (Probably from advanced timing.) I
enjoy driving it.

In Brazil they make ethanol for $0.83 per gallon. Sugar cane is a
much better feedstock than corn. Corn has starch, and you have to
convert starch to sugar before you ferment it; sugar cane has sugar to
start with. And you can burn the remaining stalks and leaves to
generate electricity. Brazil is doing it.

> IT STILL will only be a stop gap measure
> unless combined as a hybrid (or???) with a technology capable of
> regenerative braking(compressed air, hydraulic
> accumulators,electricity). Of those technologies, it's hard to imagine
> our great grandchildren NOT using electricity as the prime mover for
> personal autos.

A hybrid running on E85 would be very cheap to run. Let's hope the
batteries can be further improved. And we have to build nuclear
reactors for the electricity.

If we don't solve this oil problem soon, there is a disaster coming.
Oil is never going to get consistently cheaper. New discoveries can
push back doomsday, but it cannot be pushed back forever.

Today, oil is up to $134+ per barrel.

Ben
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Uncle Ben

External


Since: Apr 28, 2007
Posts: 81



(Msg. 70) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:49 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On May 22, 10:31 am, "Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)"
<DwightSchr... DeleteThis @DunderMifflin.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2008 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <b... DeleteThis @greenba.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The
> >Brazilian solution to this problem in the 1970-1980 period was
> >dictatorial:  require stations to offer ethanol.  Today they are
> >energy independent.
....
> Brazil also has a large supply of *waste* sugar cane.

And make ethanol out of it for $0.83 per gallon
.....
> Personally, I think the answer is to eliminate oil power whenever
> possible, making it available for uses where it truly is the best
> fuel.  

Right on.

Ben
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
"Valued Corporate #120,34

External


Since: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 20



(Msg. 71) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:31 am
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
"Valued Corporate #120,34

External


Since: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 20



(Msg. 72) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 12:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
clare at snyder dot ontar

External


Since: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 53



(Msg. 73) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 22 May 2008 12:43:25 -0400, "Valued Corporate #120,345
Employee (B A R R Y)" <DwightSchrute DeleteThis @DunderMifflin.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <ben DeleteThis @greenba.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On May 22, 10:31 am, "Valued Corporate #120,345 Employee (B A R R Y)"
>><DwightSchr... DeleteThis @DunderMifflin.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 22 May 2008 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT), Uncle Ben <b... DeleteThis @greenba.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > The
>>> >Brazilian solution to this problem in the 1970-1980 period was
>>> >dictatorial:  require stations to offer ethanol.  Today they are
>>> >energy independent.
>>....
>>> Brazil also has a large supply of *waste* sugar cane.
>>
>>And make ethanol out of it for $0.83 per gallon
>
>If only WE had a waste product like that... 8^)

With a cellulose conversion process we could use fall leaves, straw,
cornstalks, waste paper,sawdust, forestry waste, the grass cut from
the sides of roadways, and all manner of other "waste" along with
non-food crops like sawgrass.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
"Valued Corporate #120,34

External


Since: Apr 12, 2008
Posts: 20



(Msg. 74) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 8:35 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Back to top
Login to vote
clare at snyder dot ontar

External


Since: Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 53



(Msg. 75) Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 10:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Ethanol conversion? Add to elertz [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Thu, 22 May 2008 20:35:04 -0400, "Valued Corporate #120,345
Employee (B A R R Y)" <DwightSchrute.RemoveThis@DunderMifflin.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:38:47 -0400, clare at snyder dot ontario dot
>canada wrote:
>>
>>With a cellulose conversion process we could use fall leaves, straw,
>>cornstalks, waste paper,sawdust, forestry waste, the grass cut from
>>the sides of roadways, and all manner of other "waste" along with
>>non-food crops like sawgrass.
>
>That would be awesome!

Lobby your representatives to encourage them to put money towards
perfecting this technology instead of subsidizing corn sourced
ethanol.

If Bush and his pirates had put HALF what they are spending on the
"war for oil" in Iraq into this research, we would not NEED middle
east oil. The Arabs would hate us less, and the rest of the world
would not be facing punishingly high food-grain prices (which also
translates to high meat prices, bread prices, etc - not to mention the
high transport and fertilizer prices caused by the speculation in the
oil market.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
 >> Stay informed about: Ethanol conversion? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Subaru All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 5 of 6

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]