Welcome to AutoBoardz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another..

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Chrysler RSS
Related Topics:
/6 engine to 5-Speed - Is there an off the shelf 5 speed solution to putting a 5-speed manual aft of a Slant 6? Or would getting a Lakewood be less trouble? I'm thinking either Tremec or Richmond Gear, although there is probably a Getrag that would do fine and..

95 Cirrus, Engine Gone? - I have a well 95 cirrus v6, 110k. It has always had trouble starting when it is extremely cold. This is usually due to the battery being dead. It has a history of battery and mystery electric problems that often resolve Over the..

Engine Tapping - Once again my '01 300m is giving me problems. I recently went for atrip to the Grand Canyon and started noticing a tapping noise in the engine. I had never heard it before. That was about 2 months ago and since the noise has benn present. It sounds worst.

is the 3.5L 6 cyl 1994 LHS an interference engine? - Hi Does anyone know if the engine in a 1994 LHS is an engine (aka crash motor)? It's a 3.5L 6 cyl. Thanks

"Check Engine" again - I reported a week or so back that our '02 300M's light was on, with codes of P0335 and P0440 (camshaft and psosition sensor errors). This was remedied by replacing the camshaft position sensor, and I paid the $100
Next:  Chrysler: 2001 Grand Caravan Climate Control diagnosis and code reset  
Author Message
Ted Mittelstaedt

External


Since: Oct 23, 2003
Posts: 376



(Msg. 16) Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:32 pm
Post subject: Re: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another Chrysler Get Alert [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: rec>autos>makers>chrysler (more info?)

"mike n" <asdf DeleteThis @aaa.com> wrote in message
news:47abc693$0$6134$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
> WOW! I was considering a Dodge Caliber, but will buy a new Subaru when
the
> 09 Forester hits the show rooms this spring Smile

I do hope that whatever new vehicle you buy you take the advice
about building a relationship with your dealer to heart.

Ted

 >> Stay informed about: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ted Mittelstaedt

External


Since: Oct 23, 2003
Posts: 376



(Msg. 17) Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 12:24 am
Post subject: Re: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another Chrysler Get Alert [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:166d8cf3-7f04-452a-8c49-3a2ae180eb18@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 8, 4:45 am, Bill Putney <b....DeleteThis@kinez.net> wrote:
> > mike n wrote:
> > > WOW! I was considering a Dodge Caliber, but will buy a new Subaru
when the
> > > 09 Forester hits the show rooms this spring Smile My current Subaru has
been
> > > extremely reliable. Why roll the dice on a Mopar?
> >
> > Have you spent any time on Subaru forums in the last few years? They
> > are definitely not without problems either. Clutch problems, brake
> > problems, rear wheel bearing problems...
>
> The old Subarus with the pushrod EA81 and similar were very reliable
> maintainable cars. The newer ones IMO are complicated and while
> reliable can get very expensive to keep going OOW.
>
> The auto makers just can not fathom some of us do not like high tech
> cars. Of course the Nazi US vehicle laws do not make it any easier.
>
> Were we to harmonize our safety and emissions laws with Japan and the
> EU we would save billions of dollars a year.

In both Japan and EU a smaller percentage of the population owns a
car and drives regularly. Instead they have a lot of mass transit. As a
result they can be very nasty on the driving exams, they don't allow
newbie drivers on the road who don't know how to drive. Also they
practically cut your head off if you are caught drunk driving. As a result
you get a better quality of driver.

Why should Japan have to pay extra money so the airbags in their cars
are large enough to save an unbelted adult in a 60Mph crash? Everyone there
wears a seat belt.

In the US we have to let everyone and their dog behind the wheel, as a
result
the safety regulations have to be a lot tougher to allow for the worse
calibre of
drivers.

Ted

 >> Stay informed about: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Some O

External


Since: Jun 21, 2006
Posts: 140



(Msg. 18) Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 1:24 am
Post subject: Re: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another Chrysler Get Alert [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <BJ4mQCBKg9HM-pn2-NcjFdzpPisdm@localhost>,
"Count Floyd" <CountFloyd RemoveThis @MonsterChillerHorrorTheater.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 03:03:43 UTC, "mike n" <asdf RemoveThis @aaa.com> wrote:
>
> > WOW! I was considering a Dodge Caliber, but will buy a new Subaru when
> > the
> > 09 Forester hits the show rooms this spring Smile My current Subaru has been
> > extremely reliable. Why roll the dice on a Mopar?

> > <txjeep7 RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
> My wife and I bought a 2007 Caliber in August, it has over 10K miles
> and is getting 28-30mgp in mixed driving, not problems and solid. One
> of the best Chrysler products I have ever bought.

I just returned from a 900 km return trip through the western Canadian
mountains with my '95 Concorde.
Ran like a clock, up two steep snowy mountain roads to over 4,200 ft.
and cruising at 130KPH on bare pavement to avoid being passed by grit
throwing large SUVs and pickups. Fuel mileage as when new, a new car of
the same size would use only slightly less fuel.
On the return a Feb. thaw had started and fortunately I managed to avoid
several large rock and ice falls on the road, so didn't have to mount my
FULL SIZED spare. If I damaged a tire and only could store a compact
spare, I'd have no room to store the flat. Actually I couldn't continue
my trip without a matching tire.
I just washed the mess off it today and my only new damage is a few very
tiny chips in the hood front top paint coat.
In the ski season I do several of these trips, most only 340KM return
and still not a sign of body rust after many years of these trips.
A great Canadian body.
This car has proven itself again to be very tough, designed and built
well for such driving. Too bad Chrysler hasn't a replacement for it, but
I'll wait as long as this Concorde meets my requirements.
 >> Stay informed about: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
rob

External


Since: May 22, 2008
Posts: 14



(Msg. 19) Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 12:07 am
Post subject: Re: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another Chrysler Get Alert [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

how much is a quart of oil over there? Mercedes sometimes have 15,000 oil
change intervals and that's not always because of them running Mobil 1 in
them...


"Burgerman" <burgerman.RemoveThis@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:z4Noj.302$j95.265@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
> "maxpower" <damnnickname.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:iJGdnRvbq8RZ-z7anZ2dnUVZ_oGjnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm.RemoveThis@toybox.placo.com> wrote in message
>> news:newscache$41kjvj$qdp1$1@news.ipinc.net...
>>>
>>> <txjeep7.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:25e85a06-e8d7-442c-95c3-bb92965427ed@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>>> > I have driven Chrysler vehicles exclusively almost my entire life.
>>> > Over the years, I've owned Dodges, Jeeps, Plymouths, Chryslers, and
>>> > even an Eagle. Currently, my primary vehicle is a 2002 5.9L Dodge
>>> > Durango. It has 59,000 miles on the odometer.
>>> >
>>> > A few weeks ago, it started running rough and the check engine light
>>> > came on. Upon diagnosis, the problem was revealed to be that small
>>> > pieces of the camshaft were actually breaking off, which had burned
>>> > the valves. A major repair job was required, involving replacement
>>> > of the camshaft and a complete valve job. The total bill came to
>>> > about $2200.
>>> >
>>> > The owner of the repair shop, who is very trustworthy and has been
>>> > used by my family for years, spent 20+ years as a GM factory service
>>> > rep. He advised that this sort of problem was virtually unheard of on
>>> > a late model vehicle with this low amount of miles, and that even
>>> > though it was a little bit out of warranty, I should seek redress
>>> > with Chrysler because it was so obviously a manufacturer defect. He
>>> > gave me the old camshaft and told me to take it to the Dodge dealer
>>> > and show it to them; He stated that any competent mechanic could see
>>> > instantly that it was an "extremely defective" part. He also said
>>> > that in his years at GM, if a customer had brought in such a case,
>>> > they would have opened an investigation and offered partial or even
>>> > full compensation for the repair job.
>>> >
>>> > A visit to the local Dodge dealership proved otherwise. The service
>>> > rep had no itnerest in looking at the camshaft, and more or less
>>> > accused me of having caused the problem by not ever changing the oil
>>> > (in fact, I change it with Mobil1 every 3000 miles, since I had
>>> > planned on keeping this vehicle forever.) He tossed me a card with
>>> > Chrysler's 1-800 number on it, and told me it was their problem.
>>> >
>>>
>>> As well he should. You didn't take your vehicle into his shop for a
>>> repair, you took it to a private mechanic. Why should he help you?
>>>
>>> > Not to be dissuaded, I called the number he provided. After much
>>> > time on hold and being transferred around, I was summarily told that
>>> > the vehicle was out of warranty and therefore any defect was my
>>> > problem, tough luck. The Chrysler rep also made some not-so-subtle
>>> > hints that I probably hadn't maintained the vehicle properly and/or
>>> > was in cahoots with the mechanic trying to pull a con job. They had
>>> > no more interest in looking at the camshaft than the dealer did.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I think your missing the point. If you had taken it to a Chrysler
>>> dealer
>>> then Chrysler corp. would be assured that the camshaft had actually
>>> been in your car. I'll also bet that you didn't take your truck into
>>> the dealership for regular oil changes, you took it to your other
>>> mechanic or a quick oil change place.
>>
>> AGREED!!
>>>
>>> Here's the deal. You bought a new vehicle. You elected to deny
>>> the Chrysler dealer the profits for regular maintainence during the
>>> warranty period. Thus you deprived yourself of the chance of building
>>> a relationship of trust with the dealer.
>>
>> AGREED
>>>
>>> You don't seem to understand I think that car dealerships depend on
>>> the profits from the service department to stay in business. No car
>>> dealership could survive if they didn't do service work and just
>>> depended
>>> on the margin on vehicle sales.
>>>
>>> You have a relationship of trust with your "family" mechanic that
>>> is a result of years of doing business with him. As a result he is
>>> willing to cut you deals and go to bat for you. If you had given
>>> the same car dealership that you bought your truck from all of
>>> the maintainence work, you would have that same relationship
>>> with them - and likely the dealership owner would go to bat for
>>> you against Chrysler.
>>
>> AGREED! Damn Ted your good!
>>>
>>> Let's see. Mfg recommended intervals for oil changes are 6K
>>> right? That's a total of 10 oil changes since it was new. Suppose
>>> the quickie lube does changes for $20 a change, and the dealership's
>>> obscene rates are $60 for an oil change. So it seems to me
>>> here that you saved $400 in oil changes by having the quickie lube
>>> do them - but you lost $2200 in an engine rebuild. Not a very
>>> smart thing I think.
>>>
>>> > It is appalling to me that a late model vehicle would have its engine
>>> > fall apart at 59k miles
>>
>> The 5.2 and 5.9 is a very good engine and I was sorry to see it go.
>> Chrysler
>> doesnt know what the intake looked like before the repairs. It was more
>> then
>> likely sludged up and cleaned after the repairs.
>>>
>>> Under normal wear and tear I'd agree with this.
>>>
>>> > and the manufacturer would take zero
>>> > responsibility.
>>>
>>> Not appalling at all. How do they know how you were treating the
>>> vehicle unless you were visiting them all of the time for the little
>>> piddly stuff?
>>>
>>> > After decades of buying, owning, and driving
>>> > Chryslers, and after years of fighting the tide of my friends
>>> > switching to foreign cars by telling them how great an experience I've
>>> > always had, I am now swearing off Chryslers forever. (I haven't
>>> > decided if I'm switching away from American cars altogether, or if
>>> > maybe I'll give GM or Ford a try.) The new Challenger I had my eye on
>>> > to buy in the next year or two is no longer under consideration. My
>>> > money will go to companies that manufacture cars that function
>>> > properly and that take responsibility for their products. From now
>>> > on, when people mention they're considering the purchase of a
>>> > Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep, I'll be sure to do my damndest to talk them out
>>> > of it.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Are you going to sell your truck? If not, then I would see how much
>>> more life you get out of it. What happens if you get another 160,000
>>> miles out of it without trouble, in which case what are you going to be
>>> saying about Chrysler vehicles then?
>>
>> He may get that if the oil is changed at the proper intervals
>
>
> What do you call "proper" intervals?
>
> Because I bought a US spec 2007 Dodge Caravan 3.8 new and imported it.
>
> In the US and in the service book it says 3000 miles.
> The same vehicle (albiet with the 3.3 version of the same engine and
> called the Chrysler Voyager) is available here in the UK but right hand
> drive.
> It has 12,000 miles between changes specified.
>
> I think 12k miles is as lot. But I think 3k miles is rediculously short.
> Here in Europe I dont think there are any cars avasilable with such a
> short interval! Even ones that are also sold in the US. Almost all specify
> 6, 10 or 12 thousand mile intervals. There are lots of very old 200
> thousand mile taxis and company cars still running just fine! The scrap
> yards get them due to rust before the engines give up!
>
> Personally I do it every 5k miles with Mobil 1 full synthetic 0w/40 rather
> than the fuel saving tap water thin 5w/20 specified for a bit of belt and
> braces peace of mind.
 >> Stay informed about: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
C-BODY

External


Since: Sep 24, 2005
Posts: 16



(Msg. 20) Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 1:29 am
Post subject: Re: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another Get Alert [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

As a general rule, GM might take better care of their customers and use
"Goodwill" to help pay for out-of-warranty (not significantly-so,
however) customer repair expenses. At least, they have been known to
try to help out rather than otherwise. As the FAQs state, building a
good relationship at the dealership IS important if YOU "expect" to get
any type of consideration in times of need . . . does NOT matter if it's
Chrysler, Ford, GM, or otherwise.

Having a trusted private mechanic can be a good thing, but there are
ALSO times when it can be a hindrance--this is one of them. If the
engine had been torn down in a dealership's repair shop, it would have
been much different than if it's been taken apart somewhere else (as it
was in this case). Having the dealership's operatives see for
themselves the allegedly flaking camshaft lobes IS highly important.
Carrying the same camshaft into a dealership's service department and
wanting them to fix it is NOT the same thing--period! Doesn't matter if
it's Chrysler or another manufacturer, either!

For what it's worth, the comments about poor maintenance might be
considered "standard blame" items rather than otherwise. Therefore,
don't take then seriously as such.

So, 60,000 miles on a tried-true engine built by Chrysler and it has a
camshaft problem. I'd say it was a defective situation, typically, even
with "so-so" maintenance and non-synthetic motor oil and a discount
store oil filter. But as the engine was "off-site" from the dealership
and the miles were "out of warranty" and the factory's stated warranty
obligations, not much you can do. No oil change documentation was
readily available, either, I suspect? And you present parts purported
to be from said engine to a dealership operative and expect them to roll
over and hand you new parts for nothing?

Consider, how you might react in the same situation IF you were at the
dealership and somebody did the same thing you did. Would you believe
them completely? After all, you might be seeing a bad camshaft but how
do you know (beyond a reasonable doubt) that it came from an engine with
60K miles on it? Especially with the knowledge that you'd not seen any
similar things in your dealership repair shop?

It's unfortunate that you got a "brush off" of sorts, but as a legal
responsibility, the factory's responsibility ended at the end of the
factory's stated warranty period. This would have been a good situation
to have had a MANUFACTURER's extended warranty (NOT, repeat NOT an
aftermarket extended warranty!!!).

Now, as the camshaft lobes were having "issues", what about the valve
lifters on those particular lobes? Another key issue!

From the dealership side of things, getting into the financial side of
dealership operations for lube-rack operations is not really a part of
this whole situation. BUT doing business with a dealership and building
a relationship with them IS important as it is with any other business
we might choose to do business with. Having a private mechanic that is
trusted and honorable is a GREAT thing, but when it was discovered that
it might be a defective part situation, THAT's when the private mechanic
should have called (HIMSELF!) the dealership's service manager and told
him what he's found and ask the service manager to come inspect the
vehicle rather than giving you "defective" parts to take to the
dealership and request they do something about them. With all due
respect, I would hope that your former GM service rep might understand
the dynamics of that situation!

Now, defective camshaft lobes do NOT cause burnt valves. Worn valve
guides cause burnt valves as as the guide to valve stem clearance
increases, it will let the valve stem wobble inside the valve guide and
not seat as firmly against the machined valve seat in the cylinder head.
Over a period of time, the valve seat will erode from the exhaust gas
leakage from the valve that doesn't always seat fully.

In the cylinder head, either the valve seats are induction hardened or
they have hard inserts in the heads so unleaded fuels are better
tolerated . . . been that way on Chrysler engines since about 1973 when
they approved the use of unleaded fuel only in their V-8s.

If the valve seats in the cylinders heads (whether induction hardened or
with hard inserts) were worn away and the valve guides were worn, THAT
would be a defect of manufacturing that would not show up during the
normal warranty period. It could be possible that THAT is what might
have caused the valve lifter to impact the camshaft lobes and cause the
wear pattern you mentioned. So, the sequency of events would be
BACKWARD from what you mentioned--cylinder head/valve issues caused the
camshaft issues and not the other way around. Again, I would suspect a
competent engine mechanic would know these things (another "negative" on
your trusted former GM service rep, at least to me . . . he might be a
good guy, but many service reps are NOT good engineering or mechanical
types in all areas of engine operation . . . with all due respect and my
own observations from over 30 years in dealership parts and service
activities).

In reality, you could have had similar situations at ANY brand of
vehicle dealership. If Toyotas didn't break, there would be NO need for
the expanded service facilities current Toyota dealerships are upgrading
too--they're not doing it just for "by the book" maintenance operations
either.

European oil standards are different than what we see here in the USA.
Different oil specs, too, in some cases so that the "long change
intervals" can be supported.

A few years ago Mercedes had a big flap over "engine problems". Some
USA owners read the owners manual and saw the extended change intervals
recommended and took them at their word. In the cases where the dealers
did the oil changes, there was sufficient and trusted documentation of
the oil changes being done and at what mileage and what oil was used.
When those engines broke, Mercedes had no recourse but to replace them.
In the situations where the owners had the oil changes done elsewhere,
the burden of proof was upon THEM for documentation of time/mileage and
oil used--those people's success in getting their engines fixed was
highly variable, as a result.

As it turned out, the extended oil change intervals for Euro-brand
vehicles is highly dependent upon the oil used. This is why BMW, VW,
and othes have their own brand-packaged oil AND their own factory
approval specs for oils to be used in their engines. These are EURO
oils and NOT the same as normally-available oils in the USA (unless you
know how to read the oil bottles and such!). For BMW, the normal
maintenance and oil changes are part of their basic factory warranty
coverage, so they side-stepped the bad publicity that Mercedes and
Toyota have received over oil issues.

There are also differences in how Europeans are purported to take care
of their vehicles as compared to the general USA citizenry. This is
another factor in the extended change intervals of vehicles used in
Europe, even if the same vehicles are sold in the USA (with a different
maintenance schedule for oil changes).

On the dealership side of things, they didn't go broke NOT doing your
oil changes. But them not doing them takes away a huge amount of
credible documentation which could have been KEY in this situation (or
any other similar situation where it can be Your word against theirs).

Plus, if ANY "Check Engine" light comes on, you need to take it to the
dealership as the EMISSIONS WARRANTY usually goes on long past the basic
factory mechanical warranty on the vehicle. In some cases, it can go to
100K miles! What that means is that the manufacturer backs the vehicle
to meet federal emissions standards for 100K miles from new. If it does
not, they're obligated to fix it (which is usually a sensor or something
like that rather than an internal engine problem). Do NOT take it to an
auto supply to get them to see what the computer codes might be (so they
can help you start throwing parts at the problem and hopefully something
will fix it . . . at YOUR expense and their profit).

Do NOT take their recommendations to a dealership and expect them to fix
it without them using THEIR factory-approved scan tools, either (in an
effort to get around paying the dealership's "check out fee"), so they
can see what's going on and fix it according to what THEY see. It all
sounds really easy and cut and dried to pull the codes and start
replacing the "needed" parts without first understanding what will cause
particular codes to set--sometimes, one malfunction will set numerous
codes and if you don't know how they might interact, you can chunk lots
of parts at the problem and the codes don't go away and the vehicle is
not fixed.

Hopefully, IF you've read this far, you'll have a better understanding
of what went wrong in the dynamics of your situation AND how they could
have been prevented. Unfortunately, due to the many mis-steps and
elevated tempers, you're going to spend a good bit of money that might
have been covered in another manner . . . but NOT in the independent
repair shop (without some dealership service rep's involvement when the
situation was FIRST discovered rather than after the fact).

On the plus side, when you get your 5.9L V-8 repaired (hopefully with
factory-spec parts and a new timing chain), it'll be ready for a LOT of
more miles of reliable use. After all, the market valve of SUVs is down
so you might as well drive it than take a beating on resale value in
today's market. IF your engine has the flat-tappet valve lifters, be
sure to get a FACTORY camshaft as much of the issue with camshaft
durability in replacement camshafts has been with "replacement"
camshafts rather than factory-supplied camshafts. Yep, they'll cost a
good bit more, but they can be worth it in the long run.

Regards,

C-BODY
 >> Stay informed about: Engine fell apart at 59k mi - Why I will never buy another.. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   AutoBoardz (Home) -> Chrysler All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]