Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

In article , virig wrote:
>Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this
>technology to save money and improve the environment.
>http://carwithwater.googlepages.com/beat_fuel_prices_using_water
go spam your mother, doucebag.
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

In article , Sir F. A. Rien wrote:
>Desertphile found these unused words:
>
>>On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this
>>> technology to save money and improve the environment.
>>
>>Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google.
>
>Long been proved that the breakdown of H2O into HHO uses more energy than it
>gives back when 'utilized'. The energy used in the origination of the
>breakdown simple generates more pollution, just in a different place!
>
>It's akin to the "non-polluting" electric! The pollution is incurred at the
>generating facility, rather than at the using end of the chain.
>
>IF the libs and greenies would GOTDA, then perhaps nuclear generation could
>make it efficient to have electric powered vehicles for city and suburb.
>
don't bother. these talking turds are just spam scum trying to pick your
pocket. no brains AND no balls.
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

On Aug 2, 9:03 am, Sir F. A. Rien wrote:
> Desertphile found these unused words:
>
> >On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig
> > wrote:
>
> >> Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this
> >> technology to save money and improve the environment.
>
> >Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google.
>
> Long been proved that the breakdown of H2O into HHO uses more energy than it
> gives back when 'utilized'. The energy used in the origination of the
> breakdown simple generates more pollution, just in a different place!
>
> It's akin to the "non-polluting" electric! The pollution is incurred at the
> generating facility, rather than at the using end of the chain.
>
> IF the libs and greenies would GOTDA, then perhaps nuclear generation could
> make it efficient to have electric powered vehicles for city and suburb.

I don't know what "libs and greenies" are (presumably a regulatory
agency), but the reason nuclear generators are so expensive is due to
the waste involved and the hazards of moving that waste. There are
many evil bastards in YouTube trying to defraud people with the "HOH"
scam, claiming the process will save money in gasoline costs--- but
mostly the scam is for "investors" to buy into the scam.

Perhaps "clean coal" is the way to go at the moment, for the next 40
or 50 years.
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the
public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill for
GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values"


"Desertphile" wrote in message

> On Aug 2, 9:03 am, Sir F. A. Rien wrote:
>> Desertphile found these unused words:
>>
>> >On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:28:15 -0700 (PDT), virig
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> Water fueled cars are a reality and many people are using this
>> >> technology to save money and improve the environment.
>>
>> >Also known as "Fraud." Please look up this scam via Google.
>>
>> Long been proved that the breakdown of H2O into HHO uses more energy than
>> it
>> gives back when 'utilized'. The energy used in the origination of the
>> breakdown simple generates more pollution, just in a different place!
>>
>> It's akin to the "non-polluting" electric! The pollution is incurred at
>> the
>> generating facility, rather than at the using end of the chain.
>>
>> IF the libs and greenies would GOTDA, then perhaps nuclear generation
>> could
>> make it efficient to have electric powered vehicles for city and suburb.
>
> I don't know what "libs and greenies" are (presumably a regulatory
> agency), but the reason nuclear generators are so expensive is due to
> the waste involved and the hazards of moving that waste. There are
> many evil bastards in YouTube trying to defraud people with the "HOH"
> scam, claiming the process will save money in gasoline costs--- but
> mostly the scam is for "investors" to buy into the scam.
>
> Perhaps "clean coal" is the way to go at the moment, for the next 40
> or 50 years.
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:38 -0700, "Fuller Wrath"
wrote:

> nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the
> public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill for
> GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values"

Er, corndogs and book shelves are also "subsidized by the public:"
it's called "capitalism."

The topic of this article thread is the HOH scam, not atomic power
plants.


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

Okay moronicus,

Are your eyes brown? They must be because you are full of it. Nuclear power
is the least cost effective and most environmentally toxic power source
available. I suppose we can dispose of the waste by-products in your back
yard because no one else wants them. Check out the Price-Anderson Nuclear
Industries Indemnity Act. It lets the nuclear industry off the hook when one
of their time bombs melts down.

And what does FRANCE do with their nuclear waste? They glassify is which is
fine for a few hundred years. Then what? it becomes highly toxic. Your
arguments are typical talking points of an informed right wing toady.

I prefer to cite Three Mile Island and Chernobyl models. Much more
realistic.

Stop sucking on Rushbo's teat and try thinking of an alternative to a toxic
power source. No one ever died from exposure to solar or wind power. The
only reason they are in an arrested state of development is because butt
poodle conservatives have been on their knees to the big oil boys for fifty
years.

No, I think you are the one full of shite.



"Sir Loin of Crotch" wrote in message

> "Fuller Wrath" found these unused words:
>
>>nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the
>>public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill for
>>GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values"
>>
> Really ... then how do you explain the safe, continued use of nuclear
> systems by countries as FRANCE (who hates everything american!), UK and
> Germany, not to mention several other countries, now getting a third or
> more
> of their electicity from NUCLEAR PLANTS?
>
> ALL electric plants are 'totally subsidized' by the public as it is a
> SERVICE to them! Do try and understand how things function, eh?
>
> Is nuclear power more expensive than wind? Do some checking befor you
> pan,
> as to the costs of alternatives!
>
> Is this all because you're 'fuller wrath' rather than 'fuller brains'?
>
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

Another brain fart oozes forth



"Desertphile" wrote in message

> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:38 -0700, "Fuller Wrath"
> wrote:
>
>> nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the
>> public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill
>> for
>> GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values"
>
> Er, corndogs and book shelves are also "subsidized by the public:"
> it's called "capitalism."
>
> The topic of this article thread is the HOH scam, not atomic power
> plants.
>
>
> --
> http://desertphile.org
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO 

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 11:08:56 -0700, "Fuller Wrath"
wrote:

> Another brain fart oozes forth

You shouldn't take so much pride in your "brain farts" in public:
it's embarassing.

> "Desertphile" wrote in message
>
> > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 17:37:38 -0700, "Fuller Wrath"
> > wrote:
> >
> >> nuclear is the joke and fraud of the century. Totally subsidized by the
> >> public, completely toxic, outrageously expensive. Only a pawn or shill
> >> for
> >> GE and the nuke lobby would try to extol its "values"
> >
> > Er, corndogs and book shelves are also "subsidized by the public:"
> > it's called "capitalism."
> >
> > The topic of this article thread is the HOH scam, not atomic power
> > plants.
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://desertphile.org
> > Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> > "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
>


--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
 >> Stay informed about: Converting water to powerful hydrogen fuel called HHO