what? a Bond movie?

I've been wanting to see the new Bond movie, just because I've seen all
of them and will always see all of them. That is the perfect reason, IMO.

But, snoozing through IMDB I caught this little bit of review, which I
loved (thank you to unnamed reviewer):

"They have borrowed some elements from the Bourne series of films which
is long overdue on the franchise, more realistic fight sequences and
with Daniel Craig actually looking like a physically capable man instead
of the middle aged paunch of Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan who both
quite frankly couldn't beat up a Ritz cracker."

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:23:35 -0700, deathbyferrari <user.DeleteThis@example.net>
wrote:
>I've been wanting to see the new Bond movie, just because I've seen all
>of them and will always see all of them. That is the perfect reason, IMO.

S'truth.

>But, snoozing through IMDB I caught this little bit of review, which I
>loved (thank you to unnamed reviewer):
>
>"They have borrowed some elements from the Bourne series of films

A goodness, why?

>which
>is long overdue on the franchise, more realistic fight sequences

Nonsense.

The fight in the stairwell, alone, was as cartoonish a sequence as
anything in Tom and Jerry: Clearly written, produced and performed by
people whose experience in brawling is limited to screaming at their
mums for not cutting the crusts off of their bacon butties.

>and
>with Daniel Craig actually looking like a physically capable man instead

'Out of work lifeguard'.

>of the middle aged paunch of Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan

Unfair to tar Brosnan with that pastry brush.

>who both quite frankly couldn't beat up a Ritz cracker."

A pithy line, but horribly inaccurate; Bond was never so depressingly
about brawn over brain.

--

"...Luigi follow only the Ferraris."