This is clearly off topic, so I will limit myself to this final comment.
This is the reference to top or bottom posting in 1855.
If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you
summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just
enough text of the original to give a context. This will make
sure readers understand when they start to read your response.
Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
response to a message before seeing the original. Giving context
helps everyone. But do not include the entire original!
Again, there are NO Standards.
Do as you please. If you decide to ignore any of my top posted messages
you may or may not miss something useful to you.
You makes your choice and takes your chances.
I have seen more "Net Nanny's" laughed off Usenet than
stick around trying to push a moot point.
Regards,
JR
BTW, The RFC's were written by a group of university affiliated
persons trying to create a controlling influence over all things internet.
Their postulations were largely ignored and relegated to the ashheap
when their intentions became obvious. In fact, many of the original
institutions have purged their archives to distance themselves from
the attempt of creating that "controlling influence".
"Eugene Nine" <no.RemoveThis@spam.com> wrote in message
news:7-WdnUdpzqfgfjvZnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
> JR wrote:
>
>> Usenet has NO STANDARD as to top or bottom posting.
>> It is personal preference and the Usenet GUIDELINES state as much.
>>
>
> RFC1855 is the guideline which says to not top post.
> Yes all rfc's are just guidelines but when you don't follow those
> guidelines
> communication breaks down. Just try to follow an old thread which has
> been
> top posted and you will see. Thats why when I got on the internet years
> ago I looked up the standard to see what it was.
> >> Stay informed about: 99 Silverado Rear Brake Rusted & Parking