> So you want a fun car but you don't want to pay for the lower mileage
> that is a part of the package?
>
> Still in your 20s I take it?
Not really, I'm just wondering why V-Tech doesn't help more with regard
to economy. The promise of V-Tech is that, with effectively having two
sets of cams, one CAN have the best of two worlds--the docile idle,
lower rpm torque, and better economy on the prime cam lobes, and lots
of high reving power on the secondary lobes. The EPA estimates of 26
city & 31 highway seem very low but as we all know "your milage may
vary". I tend to do better than EPA estimates and I was wondering if
anybody with an SI is too. Of course, a sample of SI owners would
likely be skewed toward owners who dive for fun rather than economy but
I am interested in what is possible rather than what is average. After
all, there may be a few SI owners like me, in their fifties and well
past the boy racer stage, who occasionally want the kick in the pants
and sound of a sweet high reving engine but more often than not are
happy to trundle along in as unobtrusive and economical manner as
possible (like the old folks that we are!).
>> Stay informed about: 99 & 2000 Civic SI fuel mileage?