"Reasoned Insanity" wrote in message
>
> "Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message
>
>>
>> "Reasoned Insanity" wrote in message
>>
>>>
>>> "Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote in message
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Reasoned Insanity" wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>>I just redid the timing belt the other day and after I got all the belt
>>>>>back on the car started up fine for about 10 seconds. It then died and
>>>>>I couldn't get it to restart. I checked the plugs and found out that it
>>>>>was flooded. The next morning I took all the drive belts off (not the
>>>>>timing belt) and it started up fine and ran great. I then put all the
>>>>>drive belts back on and got the same thing as I got the night before. I
>>>>>checked my Altenator and Water pump and they both turned freely and
>>>>>they didn't have any problems with them before I did the timing belt so
>>>>>I'm thinking the timing might be too advanced. Any thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: It's the 1.8L 4 Cylinder engine
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When you say that you think the timing might be too advanced, do you
>>>> mean ignition timing? Why do you think the ignition timing is too
>>>> advanced?
>>>>
>>>> I would check to make sure the camshaft it timed to the crankshaft
>>>> correctly and not off by a notch or two.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Ray O
>>>> (correct punctuation to reply)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank Ray, now my baby is running great again.
>>
>> You're welcome!
>>
>> What fixed the problem?
>> --
>>
>> Ray O
>> (correct punctuation to reply)
>
>
> The camshaft wasn't timed to the crankshaft correctly. Sure made for some
> freaking weird symptoms though, I'd never heard of a car running w/o the
> drive belts, but not running with them before.
The most common reason for no-start or running poorly after a timing belt
replacement is mis-timing so that's where I always tell people to start
looking.
Glad to hear you're up and running again!
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)
>> Stay informed about: 95' Toyota Corolla