I've got a chopped top 37 chevy with a frame mounted master cyl. I used a
kit from chassis engineering and had to modify it to add a clutch master
cylinder and add a 2nd pedal since I decided to go to a muncie 4spd.
I have a few friends that have similar setups and none of them are remote
fill and when necessary they get under the car with a turkey baster and a
section of clear tubing. My car is still a work in progress so I haven't
had to go through the hassle of adding fluid. I prefer the frame mount only
because I want a clean firewall. Either configuration can work it is just
a matter of preference.
I have the chassis engineering mustang 2 kit for steering. I don't have
power steering but it doesn't seem to need it. I ran the car for a couple
of hundred miles with temporary wiring just to test stuff out. Right now
the drivetrain is out and I'm finishing up the body work to paint it. I
had the body off and went through all the running gear a couple of years
ago.
"Chris in Austin Tx" wrote in message
> Ive got the body off the frame today, and am about to order a TCI hub
> to hub IFS kit.
> I plan to install a chevy 350 (TBI) and 700-R although I havn't scored
> them yet. I am interested in the pros and cons of mounting the Master
> Cylinder on the firewall or using one of the frame mount kits I could
> order the same time as the IFS (300.00+). I am concerned about routing
> the exhaust so near the master, and accessing the fluid level. Remote
> fills seem really pricey.
>
> I am leaning towards the firewall installation, using a Autozone
> Mustang Cyl/Booster, and a junkyard or homemade pedal hanger, but I am
> concerned about clearance for the engine itself.
> I'd like to hear some opinions about either method.
> Thanks,
> Chris
> >> Stay informed about: '37 Chevy advice needed