 |
|
 |
|
Next: Nissan Sentra 04, cluster replacement (old one br..
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 24, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 11:48 am
Post subject: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD Archived from groups: alt>autos>volvo (more info?)
|
|
|
We are very interested in purchasing a 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD model.
However, we are really concerned about the numerous reliability (or
lack thereof) reports we have seen on Edmunds Townhalls.
What is the general consensus on this car? Is it supposed to be more
reliable than the 03-04 models? Are we going to have to replace the
Transmission after 60-70-80K miles?
Please share any comments or experiences you may have had with the
2007 and 2008 models.
Thanks
RM >> Stay informed about: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 05, 2007 Posts: 98
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 1:21 pm
Post subject: Re: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 24, 2:48 pm, wrote:
> We are very interested in purchasing a 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD model.
> However, we are really concerned about the numerous reliability (or
> lack thereof) reports we have seen on Edmunds Townhalls.
>
> What is the general consensus on this car? Is it supposed to be more
> reliable than the 03-04 models? Are we going to have to replace the
> Transmission after 60-70-80K miles?
>
> Please share any comments or experiences you may have had with the
> 2007 and 2008 models.
>
> Thanks
> RM
It's going to be difficult to get much feedback on the 2008 models.
The XC70 model has been around for several years and has decent
reliability in my experience. But today's cars are very complex and
that is why most cars come with long term warranties. At the end of 5
years most problems will have been solved in my experience with Volvo
cars.
Read the complaints on Edmunds with the understanding that the same
person may complain several times and people tend to post on forums
like that when they have problems. Those with no problems rarely
show up to gush over how perfect their car is. >> Stay informed about: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 24, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thanks.
Since the 2007 also had the same 3.2 engine and 6-speed transmission,
I would appreciate if there are any experiences with that.
--
On Oct 24, 4:21 pm, Roadie wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2:48 pm, wrote:
>
> > We are very interested in purchasing a 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD model.
> > However, we are really concerned about the numerous reliability (or
> > lack thereof) reports we have seen on Edmunds Townhalls.
>
> > What is the general consensus on this car? Is it supposed to be more
> > reliable than the 03-04 models? Are we going to have to replace the
> > Transmission after 60-70-80K miles?
>
> > Please share any comments or experiences you may have had with the
> > 2007 and 2008 models.
>
> > Thanks
> > RM
>
> It's going to be difficult to get much feedback on the 2008 models.
> The XC70 model has been around for several years and has decent
> reliability in my experience. But today's cars are very complex and
> that is why most cars come with long term warranties. At the end of 5
> years most problems will have been solved in my experience with Volvo
> cars.
>
> Read the complaints on Edmunds with the understanding that the same
> person may complain several times and people tend to post on forums
> like that when they have problems. Those with no problems rarely
> show up to gush over how perfect their car is. >> Stay informed about: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 17, 2005 Posts: 70
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:31 pm
Post subject: Re: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 10/24/2007 5:17 PM, wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Since the 2007 also had the same 3.2 engine and 6-speed transmission,
> I would appreciate if there are any experiences with that.
>
> --
>
> On Oct 24, 4:21 pm, Roadie wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2:48 pm, wrote:
>>
>>> We are very interested in purchasing a 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD model.
>>> However, we are really concerned about the numerous reliability (or
>>> lack thereof) reports we have seen on Edmunds Townhalls.
>>> What is the general consensus on this car? Is it supposed to be more
>>> reliable than the 03-04 models? Are we going to have to replace the
>>> Transmission after 60-70-80K miles?
>>> Please share any comments or experiences you may have had with the
>>> 2007 and 2008 models.
>>> Thanks
>>> RM
>> It's going to be difficult to get much feedback on the 2008 models.
>> The XC70 model has been around for several years and has decent
>> reliability in my experience. But today's cars are very complex and
>> that is why most cars come with long term warranties. At the end of 5
>> years most problems will have been solved in my experience with Volvo
>> cars.
>>
>> Read the complaints on Edmunds with the understanding that the same
>> person may complain several times and people tend to post on forums
>> like that when they have problems. Those with no problems rarely
>> show up to gush over how perfect their car is.
>
>
Volvo stopped using the transmission that was used in the early XC90 &
went back to a transmission made by Asian Warner there have not been any
problems with this transmission unlike the transmission made by GM there
was & still are problems with that unit
--
" Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new"
-- Albert Einstein >> Stay informed about: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 05, 2007 Posts: 98
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 5:47 am
Post subject: Re: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 24, 5:17 pm, wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Since the 2007 also had the same 3.2 engine and 6-speed transmission,
> I would appreciate if there are any experiences with that.
>
> --
>
> On Oct 24, 4:21 pm, Roadie wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 24, 2:48 pm, wrote:
>
> > > We are very interested in purchasing a 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD model.
> > > However, we are really concerned about the numerous reliability (or
> > > lack thereof) reports we have seen on Edmunds Townhalls.
>
> > > What is the general consensus on this car? Is it supposed to be more
> > > reliable than the 03-04 models? Are we going to have to replace the
> > > Transmission after 60-70-80K miles?
>
> > > Please share any comments or experiences you may have had with the
> > > 2007 and 2008 models.
>
> > > Thanks
> > > RM
>
> > It's going to be difficult to get much feedback on the 2008 models.
> > The XC70 model has been around for several years and has decent
> > reliability in my experience. But today's cars are very complex and
> > that is why most cars come with long term warranties. At the end of 5
> > years most problems will have been solved in my experience with Volvo
> > cars.
>
> > Read the complaints on Edmunds with the understanding that the same
> > person may complain several times and people tend to post on forums
> > like that when they have problems. Those with no problems rarely
> > show up to gush over how perfect their car is.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
My mistake - I thought you were asking about the XC70. I can't tell
you much about the XC90. >> Stay informed about: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 21, 2004 Posts: 153
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:21 am
Post subject: Re: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
RM, wrote:
> We are very interested in purchasing a 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD model.
> Please share any comments or experiences you may have had with the
> 2007 and 2008 models.
The early opinion on the 2007 model is that it is a major improvement
over previous years and is considered to have average reliability.
Whatever they are doing, it seems to be in the right direction. Since
most 2007 models don't have much mileage yet, there could still be
problems down the pike. For people on a tight budget, it might be a
good idea to choose a good dealer and get an extended service policy.
--
Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA, USA
Owned '67,'68,'71,'74,'79,'81,'87,'93,'95 & '01 Volvos.
The '67,'74,'79,'87,'95 and '01 through European Delivery.
http://rhodyman.net/homevo.html >> Stay informed about: 2008 Volvo XC90 3.2 AWD |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Volvo XE90 vs. XC90, what's the difference - I know the XC90, but read an article about a XE, but I can't find any decent information about it. Is it a miss spelling, or a nickname? Regards Peter
FS: 2005 Volvo XC90 V8 37 k $27,995 - 37,800 miles Black suv on black interior 8 Cylinders Automatic, 5 door, AWD A/C: Front, A/C: Rear, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Steering, Remote Keyless Entry, Leather Interior, Memory Seats, Power Seats, Airbag: Driver, Airbag: Passenger, Airbag...
xc90 markup - At volvo site. 2007 Base xc90 3.2 fwd with standard everything MSRP approx 38K. At dealer web sites prices 48-49K for similarly equipped models (with the V8 10K higher). This is in SF bay area. I have only looked on the internet at this point but are..
buying xc90 used car what to look for? - Hello, i would like to buy a used XC 90. Are there things that I should look at before buying such a car? Known problems? Thanks
Leasing '07 XC90 - Someone posted a question about the leasing deal on an '07 XC90 with the new 3.2 ltr 6-cylinder engine. Nice car --- we've used it as a loaner from our dealer, but we still like our V8 better (it gets better gas mileage). Anyhow, the lease deal price... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|