wrote in message
On Jan 25, 5:16 am, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote:
> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I have a 1998 plymouth grand voyager (3.3 liter, 4 speed automatic
> > transmision) that currently has 151,000 miles on it. I had a
> > remanufactured transmission installed around 97,000 miles and last
> > night I noticed that the transmission shifting was a little more rough
> > than normal. When I parked the van and came back to start it after
> > 45 minutes the van seemed to operate ok in Park and Neutral but when I
> > put it in reverse it jerked and died. When I put it in drive it made
> > a horrible grinding sound in the engine compartment. This sounded
> > like the engine or transmission was falling apart. The noise would
> > occur while I had it in Drive with the brake on.
>
> > After that episode I opened the hood and checked both the Oil and
> > Transmision Fluid to see if I could smell any burnt fluids. The fluid
> > levels were OK and the transmision fluid did not smell burnt or
> > anything.
>
> > About 15 minutes later I tried to back it out of the parking lot and
> > was able to move the vehicle and drive home even though I could still
> > feel some roughness in the transmission shifting.
>
> > I am planning to go to an aut parts store to see if any Codes were
> > recorded that could help me diagnose the problem.
>
> > Has anyone experienced any problems like this?
>
> > I was going to look at the following: (Hope it is not another
> > transmission issue)
>
> > Bad spark plug wires/plugs;
> > Bad sensors (Speed/Oxygen)
> > Transmission issue.
>
> Who did the rebuild on your transmission? How long a warranty did they
> give you? Is it still under warranty?
>
> One of the issues with these transmissions is that in order to get them as
> small
> as they are with the number of gears they have, Chrysler used some very
> advanced
> construction and hardening processes in the manufacture of the gears in
the
> transmission. The problem is that a lot of transmission rebuilders when
> they
> get a transmission in that has a hard part break, they will rebuild it
with
> aftermarket parts instead of getting them over the counter from Mopar at
the
> dealership. The aftermarket is flooded with cheap Chinese knockoffs
> of the gear packs in these transmissions that do not have the reliability
> of the Mopar stuff.
>
> For one of these transmissions rebuilt in 2003 or thereabouts, pretty much
> all
> of the design flaws in these transmissions had been corrected, and all of
> the
> rebuild kits incorporate them. You should get at least 100K miles out of
> a rebuild, not 54K. The only reason it would fail prematurely is if your
> wheelspinning, or your stuck and doing the rock forward then rock back
then
> rock forward then rock back, etc. etc. Both of those manuevers will break
> these transmissions.
>
> It sounds to me like you have either a problem with the torque converter
> or in the transmission gears in the transmission.
>
> Ted- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>Thanks for the info. The remanufactured transmission I received at
>97,000 was a chrysler remanufacturer model with a 3 year 30,000 mile
>warranty. (Which has since expired) I took my van to a local auto
>repair shop and paid $45 for diagnostics to see what was wrong. The
>mechanic called and said I needed a rebuilt transmission for $1,700.
>I asked him why he thought I needed a rebuild and he said that since
>there was no error code and the noise coming from the engine sounded
>like the torque converter locking up which indicates a mechanical
>failure. As well as the harsh shifting.
I'm afraid I'd have to agree - hard part failures in these transmissions
many times do not set a code, and if they do set a code it generally
indicates something that isn't failed.
However, as to whether you need a rebuild or not - that's different.
As long as the converter hasn't fragged internally, the trans can be
separated, the converter replaced, and everything can be put back
together. Of course, there is always the chance that a piece of metal
may have got where it's not supposed to be - but you might run
that up the flagpole with the mechanic and see if he's willing to do it.
Your long term reliability is going to be a big gamble - so you might
think about selling the van when you get it back.
>Sounds logical as the sound was awful when it occurs and the vehicle
>stalls out. I now need to decide on whether to have this place do
>this, get a second opinion, or look for another used vehicle. I was
>thinking that maybe I could get the transmission flushed and refilled
>with a new filter as well as a computer upgrade to see if that fixes
>the issue. The second thing would be to replace the solinoid.
I think that is a big waste of money.
>The mechanic was reluctant to do this as he kept going back to the
>mechanical transmission noise that has already been experienced and
>that these other options may temporarily fix the issue but the failure
>of the transmission would probably reoccur.
>I was thinking on getting a second opinion. Another option would be
>to buy another chrysler/dodge minivan that is 2 to 3 years old since
>we like these vans other than the transmissions. Any ideas???
Another thing you can do if your thinking about selling it is to
call around to your local wrecking yards and see if you can
find a transmission. Also, many times these yards can refer you
to people who rebuild transmissions in their garage for extra
money. For example I own a Ford Torino, it uses a C-4. About
15 years ago I broke the transmission and when I called around
to the local wreckers, one of them was selling rebuilt C-4s I
went down there to talk to them and what they said is they
had a guy who came around once a month and took about 10-15
C-4 cores home and would rebuild them in his garage. Basically
he would strip them all down and take the best parts from the
group and create 5-10 good transmissions out of them, and
bring them and the rest of the cores back. He probably got
something like $150 a transmission for doing this and the yard
had them marked at $250. I decided to take a chance on that
deal - I did the R&R myself - and that C-4 is still running in
that Torino to this day.
Here's my $0.02 on your predicament. Assuming you go the rebuild
route, your likely going to get about 70,000 more miles on it before the
engine is entering the period where it would be worn out. If you pay the
$1700 and your driving the average 14,000 miles a year, that's 5 years
more - or $340 a year. That's going to be a lot cheaper than a note on
a 2-3 year old van. So what it boils down to is how clean is this van?
If it has never been in an accident, and the paint is shiny and not peeling,
and the interior is clean, and the underbody doesen't have rust all over
it, why then I'd go for the rebuild.
Now, as for the rebuild, you should shop around. But, not for a cheaper
price. What you want is a better warranty, and you want to find out if
the rebuild shop does a lot of these transmissions. Your mechanic may
not actually be doing the rebuild, he may only do the in-and-out and
be sending the transmission out to someone else. You need to actually
go visit the shop where it's going to be rebuilt and ask them if they can
show you their shop and inventory. And you need to find out if they
will be rebuilding yours, or if they will be swapping with one that they
already rebuilt. And, ask them what warranty they offer, and ask them
if they will give you the names of a few of their customers (ideally,
business customers) that you can call and ask if they are happy with
it.
I would not do another Chrysler "remanufactured" job. What you want
to find is a transmission shop that is local, and does a lot of these
transmissions. Also, one last thing is to make absolutely sure that
whoever does the R&R (remove and replace) refills the transmission
with ATF +4 and NOT with Dexron+Lubeguard.
Ted
>> Stay informed about: 1998 Plymouth Grandvoyager Transmission Issue?? 
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
